×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
PLRA Confuses Courts; Applies Only to Prisoners
Loaded on May 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
May, 1997, page 10
To illustrate how poorly written the PLRA is, the court of appeals for the sixth circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 still "allows individuals who are not prisoners to litigate a case without the prepayment of filing fees." In their haste to kick prisoners out of court, Congress rewrote ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- US Supreme Court: Oklahoma Pre-Parole Program Requires Hearing Before Removal
- California PIA Employees Lose Minimum Wage Suit
- Consent Decrees Create Enforceable Right
- Notes from the Unrepenitentiary: " Schooling the generations in the politics of prison", by Laura Whitehorn
- Matter of Fact
- Sixth Circuit Defines Legal Mail
- PLRA Codifies Injunction Standards in Conditions Case
- PLRA Applied to Released Prisoners
- Indiana Muslim Consent Decree Vacated under PLRA
- PLRA Allows Sua Sponte Dismissal
- PLRA Fee Requirements Not Applicable to Pending Suits
- PLRA Confuses Courts; Applies Only to Prisoners
- Ninth Circuit Affirms BOP Sentence Reductions
- Drug Policy as Social Control, by Noam Chomsky
- Virginia Warden Stabbed, by Dan Pens
- Should Prisoners Have the Right to Strike? Some Union Leaders Say "Yes!", by Phil Wilayto
- Texas Prisoners Get Second-Rate Doctors
- New Jersey Prison Guard Recruiting for KKK
- Update on Washington Money Seizure Suit, by Paul Wright
- Democracy, Racism and Disenfranchisement
- Reviews
- Illinois DOC Phone System Upheld
- Moors Settle with Indiana DOC
- Seventh Circuit Questions ADA Applicability to Prisons
- Disciplinary Finding Must Be Supported by Reliable Evidence
- Qualified Immunity for Infraction Suit
- No Care for STD Violates Eighth Amendment
- $1.65 Million Jury Verdict in Cell Assignment Case Affirmed
- Racial Rioting Erupts in L.A. Jail
- Mental Unhealth and Prisons, by E.D.
- Guard Tower Scam, by A.L.
- Do the Math, by E.D.
- News in Brief
- RFRA Allows Redaction of Religious Publication
- TRO Granted in DC Smoking Suit
- Washington EFV Ban Upheld
- $75,000 Jury Verdict in Prisoner Attack Affirmed
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Refunds Filing Fee to “Struck-Out” California Prisoner Denied Indigent Status Under PLRA, May 1, 2024. Filing Fees (PLRA), Recalling Mandate, Three Strike Litigants.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- Fourth Circuit Rejects Appeal of $700,000 Award to Maryland Prisoner Assaulted by Guards, May 1, 2023. Guard Brutality/Beatings, Settlements, Appeals.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Third Circuit Says Mixed Dismissal of Civil Rights Action Not a Strike Under PLRA, April 1, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Civilly Detained Sex Offender Plaintiff Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Not a Prisoner Under PLRA, Dec. 1, 2021. PLRA, Sex Offender Classification.