Miniken v. Walter, Ruling on fees and damages, Bulk Mail Ban on PLN Unconstitutional, 1997
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
) RECEIVED OCT I 7 BRI ~KLI ~ " I;~' t'ILtU IN I H~ &. GENDLER, J !JI U.S.OISTR ICTCC(J RT UNI TED STATE S DISTR ICT COORTEastern Distrie: of Wa~i1 in!;!cn , EASTE R.."I DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON OCT 1 S jg97 JAMES R. LARSEN, CL~ RK _ __ _ _ OEPUT' • 5 DONALD W. MINI KIN , e Pla intiff , r NO . ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF v• . • s CS-'36-4 07-JLQ JUDGMENT, STAYI NG REQUEST FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES._ AND AWARD ING REASO NABLE ATTORNEY FEE S KAY WALTER and DAVID BUSS , Defenda nts . On August 25, 1 9 97, the cour t entered a Memor a ndum Opinion tt and Order Granti ng Plainci f:'s Mo t ion f or Summary " and De ny i ng Defendants' Moeien for Summary J ud gme nt in t he aboveentit led matter (Ct . Rec. 55 ). injunct ion a g a ins t i Jud~ent The c ou r t entered a pe ~an ent the Defendants "from prohibiti ng d e l i v e ry of s an i nmate's paid-for subscription t o . a profit or nonprof it pub l ication b a s e d on ly on the fact tha t " " " inma te by ' s tandard ma il' ". i t i s ma iled t o the The court directe d the parties to ". directed Plain t iff to f i l e a Statement setting fort h the hour s expended and the reas o nab le fee per hour to li t i g a t e this case . " The parties have not com plied wi t h t hat dire c tive . ~i ch a el aa Gendler represe nts P laint iff . w. Ass i stant At t o rne y Ge neral Colleen B . Evans repres ents Defendants. " as ORDER DIRECTI~G ENTRY OF JUDGME.'IT, STAY ING REQUES T FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES , AND AWARDING REASONABLE ATTO~~ Y F E ES 1 DAMAGES : Plaintiff seeks $30.00 in compensa tory damages re pre s e nting 3 the cos t of a 2 year subsc ription to Pr i son Lega l New s , whi c h h e 4 was de ni e d , nominal d amages in t he a mount o f $1 . 0 0 f or 5 v iolatio n of his r i g ht to pr o c edu r a l due proc e s s because he e receive d n o ma il rejec t i o n no ti c e , a nd puni t ive da mages in the 7 amo un t of $250 .00 for eac h issue of e thro~ s Plainti f f does not state how many issue s of Prison Lega l Ne ws 10 were t hr-cwn away by prison officials . 11 t o the $3 1. 00 but do o b j e c t t o t he reque s t f o r punitive c a mages . 12 There=are , the 13 the su::! o f $ 3 1 . 00 i:1. compensatory and nominal d a mage s . 14 the cou =t further finds t hat Plainti f f ' s r e que s t 15 damag e s s ho u l d be s t ayed p end i ng the a p pe al p e nd i ng wit h the 1e Nint h Circuit Court o f Appe a l s . Legal Ne·....::: t ~a':;. ·.:a s a way by prison o fficials wit ho ut notice to t he Plaintif f. cou~ 42 U.S.C . § Defe:1.dants do not object fi nds t ha t Plain tif f is entit led t o r ec ove r REAS ONABt . :=: 17 " Pr i. s-~n t~e AT'I' O~ acvevee , f o r punitive FEES - 1 988 pro vides in pe r t i nent p art t ha t t he c o urt , 19 i n its d iscret i on , may allow the p revailing party in a 20 a c z Lcn a reasonable ar t o rneyve fee. 21 that Pl a ir:.tiff 's attor:ley r eas ona b l y spe nt 56 hours ee t hi s case . 22 However , Defendants do dispute that $187.5 0 per hou r is a 23 reasonable hour ly rate pu r s u a nt to the Prison Litiga tion Re form 24 Act , 42 U.S.C . !i 1997e (d J 01. " § 1983 Defendants do no t d i spu t e 42 U.S.C. 5 1 997e(d J O J au tho r izes a f e e awa r d to be made at ORDER DI RECTI NG ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. ST AYING REQUEST FOR PUNIT I VE DAMAGES, AND AWARD ING REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES , .. 1 ten days a ft e r t h e entry of judgment, serve on t he a t t o r n e y f or 2 the adverse party a nd file with t he Clerk of the Court a verified 3 bill of costs on a form whi c h will be f urnis hed by t he Cl e r k of 4 the Cour t upon request . 5 Defendants s t a t e that they have no objectio n to the 6 $1 ,332.70 origi na l ly claimed by the Plaintiff as 7 costs. a $194.60. 9 Court on the pr?per form in order to recover cos ts. 10 may file any objections wi t h the Clerk in accordance with th e 11 Local Ru le . t 2 ou t-of~pccket Plaintiff has n o w filed a reque st for a n additiona l Plaintiff must submit the se cost s to the Cler k o f the Defendan ts I':' I S HERE BY ORDERED : 1. The Clerk is d irected to enter a Judgment i n favor of 14 the Plaintiff against the Defe ndants a warding Plaintiff 15 damages and $4,339 .00 in re asonable attorney and paralegal fee s 16 for a total judgment of $4,370.00. 2. Pl a i n t i f f ' s rd q~ e s t $3~ .aO in fo r pu nitive damage$ i s STAYED 18 pending th e a ppe a l filed by t he Defendants wi t h the Nin th Circuit 19 Court of Appeals. I T IS SO ORD ERED . The Cler k is d irected to e nter this Order a nd fo rward copi e s to ~nsel. DATE D "as this ""'--day of October, ~997. / JUSTIN . QUA CKENEl.i", H 'SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE '-.-/ ORDER DIRECTI NG ENTRY OF JUDG ME~, STAYING REQUEST FOR PUNI TIVE Dk~AGES . AND AWARDING REASONABLE ATT O~VE Y FEES .•. ~~der 1 a n hourly r aCe whi ch i s 250 percent of t he fees authori zed 2 1 6 U.S .C . 3 t ha t cou rt s hav e a ut horized payme nt t o cour t -appoint ed counse l in 4 c a p i t al criminal cases at a maximum rate of $125 :00 per hour . S However, t his is not a cap ital crimi nal c as e. 6 all owe d in t h e Eastern Dis t r ic t 7 court-app oi nte¢. attc rn e y s i s $ .. 5.00 f o r out-o E- c ou rt. t i me , aec a $65 .00 for in- cou r t 9 § J 0 06A f or court-appointed counsel . of Plaintiff argues Rather , the r ate Washington under § J 006A for t ime . He re , c ounse l fo r the Plaintif f expended 56 hours of out-of- 10 co u r t t i me . 11 at to rney fe e of $ 3 , 780 .0 0 12 of 13 1 9 97 e ( d l (3). $ 4 s ~00 Therefore, Pl aint i ff is enti tled t o a r e a s on a ble ( 5 6 hours t i me s $6 7 .50 an hour o r an h o ur ), u n der 1 8 a .s. c. § 15 0 " 30 0 6A a n d 42 U.S .C. § PARAL EGAL FEES 14 is Again, Defendants do no t objec~ to the 6 .6 hours request ed 16 for p aral e gal fee s , but d o obj e c t t o th e $6 5.00 h o u r ly rate of 17 ca l cula t ion . 16 t he ma xi mu m amoun t a ll owab le for paralegal fees . 19 t ha t 20 ent i t led t o r ecover S 5 59. 0 0 i n para legal fee s 21 $ 65 . 0 0 a n hou r ) . 24 Prison Litigation, Re: ~rm $ 6 5 .0 0 a n hour i s n et; u n r eas o n a b le . az 23 T~e ACt dces not spea~ Th e cour t Theref o re, to f inds P l a i n ti f f is (8 . 6 h our s tim e s COSTS Ea stern Distri ct of Wa s h i n g t o n Loc a l Rule 54 . 1 provides in p ertinen t p a r t tha t the p arty in whos e f a vor a jud gme :l t is as re n d e r e d, and wh o i s entitled t o claim his costs, sha ll within ORDER DI RECT I NG ENTRY OF JUDGMENT , STAY ING REQUEST FOR PUN I TI VE DA.'tAGES, AND AWARDI NG REASONAB LE ATTORNEY FEES