×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Seventh Circuit Decides "Mail Box" Rule
Loaded on April 15, 1996
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1996, page 12
In a case of first impression in that circuit, the court of appeals for the seventh circuit ruled that a prisoner's pleadings are considered "filed" with the court when they are given to prison officials for mailing. The case involves an Illinois state prisoner who gave his notice of appeal ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Microsoft Out-Cells Competition, by Dan Pens
- The Keepers and the Caged: Heroes and Necromancers in the Prison System Today (Book Review), by Michael Spencer
- Racist Guards at Florida Prison, by Dan Pens
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Prison Population Statistics Available
- Not All Prisoner Lawsuits Are Frivolous, by Jon O Newman
- Iowa Supreme Court: Hearing Required Before Prisoner Funds Seized
- $55,540 in Attorney Fees for RFRA Suit
- Parole Change Violates Ex Post Facto Clause
- Washington DOC Enjoined from Taking Blood
- Grievance Discipline Struck Down
- Disciplinary Findings Must State Evidence Relied On
- Oklahoma Pre-Parole Status Creates Liberty Interest
- Exploitation of Ohio Prison Labor, by William Ridenour
- Grievance Retaliation Unlawful
- Jury Not Waived in "Doubtful Situation"
- Peruvian POWs Rescued
- Genital Groping States Claim
- Michigan ACLU Protests Religious Prison College
- Seventh Circuit Decides "Mail Box" Rule
- Damn Lies and Statistics
- Georgia Prisons Enter Dark Ages
- Michigan Consent Decree Not Changed
- Arizona's New Tin Horn Dictator, by O'Neil Stough
- RFRA Applies to Retaliation Claims
- Pelican Bay Psychiatrists Resign in Protest
- Jailhouse Lawyers Retain Right to Assist Prisoners
- Texas Guard Killed by Riot Shield
- No Jurisdiction for Some Qualified Immunity Appeals
- Permanent Injunction Issued in Madrid
- $460,800 Verdict in Ohio Beating Affirmed
- Discrimination Dismissal Reversed
- Administrative Reversal of Disciplinary Sanction Doesn't Bar Suit
- Fourth Circuit Rules on IFP Statute, Again
- Sandin Inapplicable to Detainee Disciplinary Claims
- $150,000 Jury Award in Beating Case Affirmed
- News in Brief
- Tuberculosis TRO Issued
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Holds Dismissal Not Automatic When Plaintiff Simultaneously Files Same Claims in State Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Retaliation, Court Access, Grievances, Mail.
- Ohio Sued by Non-Profit Law Firm for Opening Prisoner Legal Mail, July 15, 2025. Attorney Client, Legal Materials, Attorney Calls, Legal Mail.
- Arkansas DOC Settles Retaliation Claim by Prisoner Who Also Won Back Confiscated COVID-19 Stimulus, June 1, 2025. Retaliation for Organizing, Legal Materials, Legal Mail.
- $50,000 for Excessive Force Claim by Maryland Prisoner Who Used to Be a Guard, June 1, 2025. Classification, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Legal Mail.
- Smart Communications Files for Bankruptcy Protection, June 1, 2025. Telephones, Mail, Legal Mail, Private Phone Contractors.
- No Opened Envelopes: Hawai’i Prisons Get New Mail Scanning Technology, April 1, 2025. Mail Regulations, Police State-Surveillance, Antipsychotic Drugs/Forced Medication, Drug Laws/Offenses.
- Sixth Circuit: Leaman Doctrine Did Not Bar Ohio Prisoner’s Pro Se Federal Civil Rights Suit Over Interference with Legal Mail, Feb. 15, 2025. Legal Mail, Censorship, Lost Property.
- Pigeonly Flies Into Telecom Turbulence, Declares Bankruptcy, Jan. 15, 2025. Bankruptcy, Mail Regulations, Private Phone Contractors.
- Push to Digitize Rikers Island Mail Based on Faulty Drug Tests, Jan. 15, 2025. Drug Testing, Mail Regulations, Mail/Packages.
- Minnesota Prisoners Getting Scanned Mail, Kept Waiting 18 Months for Tablets, Jan. 15, 2025. Mechanical Searches/Scanners, Mail Regulations, Emails.