×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Connecticut Supreme Court Upholds Phone and Mail Restrictions
Loaded on April 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1997, page 16
In the February, 1995, issue of PLN we reported that Connecticut state prisoners had filed a class action suit in state court challenging prison regulations that required the recording of prisoner phone calls and that prisoners, outgoing mail could be read and censored by prison officials.
Filed under:
Telephones,
Attorney Calls,
Telephone Monitoring,
Mail Regulations.
Location:
Connecticut.
The Connecticut supreme court …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- US Supreme Court: Florida Gain Time Statute Violates Ex Post Facto, by Paul Wright
- California EFV Injunction Reversed
- California Slashes Family Visits, by Willie Wisely
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Law's Nature, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- A Matter of Fact
- PLRA Consent Decree Termination Provision Unconstitutional
- Reversal of Frivolous Dismissal Voids PLRA Strike
- PLRA Applied to Attorney Fees
- Prisoners Retain Right to Safety
- Philadelphia Fined for Degrading City Prisons
- Racial Violence in California Lockups, by Willie Wisely
- Florida Private Prison Criticized, by Dan Pens
- Impregnated Arkansas Prisoner Wins Suit
- No Double Jeopardy in Massachusetts Disciplinary Hearings
- Inadequate Jail Staffing Violates Due Process
- Ohio Jail Construction Corruption?
- No Immunity for Eighth Amendment Violation in Rectal Search
- Beating and Strip Cell Require Trial
- Farmer Remanded Again, for Discovery
- Connecticut Supreme Court Upholds Phone and Mail Restrictions
- Drug Sales Boom in Wisconsin Prisons
- Virginia Felons Disenfranchised
- A Native American Resource
- Ex-Sheriff Sex Offender Retains Pension
- FJC Prisoner Litigation Guide
- Louisiana Jail Abuse Settlement
- Texas Lawyers Unhappy About Conscription
- ABA Calls for Halt to Executions
- CBCC Associate Superintendent Resigns
- Copying Claims Not Barred by Res Judicata
- News in Brief
- Double Celling States Eighth Amendment Claim
- Seventh Circuit Analyzes RFRA
More from these topics:
- Like Prisoners, Most Jail Detainees Now Banned from Receiving Physical Mail, March 1, 2026. Jail Specific, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, Censorship, Digital Devices, Private Phone Contractors.
- Mail Went Digital in Alabama Prisons. Families Are Saying Their Mail Isn’t Being Delivered, March 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Access To Courts, Access to Computers.
- Number of Narcan Doses Raises Drug Concerns at New Jersey Prisons, March 1, 2026. Drug Overdose, Mail Regulations, Drug Treatment/Rehab, Administrative Detention/Segregation.
- Most U.S. Prisoners Now Barred from Directly Receiving Physical Mail, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Censorship, Warrantless Searches, Electronic Surveillance.
- United States Postal Service Declares Postmarks Could Be Delayed, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Access To Courts.
- An AI Model from Securus Aims to Expand Phone Call Monitoring, Dec. 1, 2025. Databases, Telephone Rates, Telephone Monitoring, Electronic Surveillance, Securus.
- FCC Votes For Dramatic Hike to Prison Phone Call Rates, Nov. 1, 2025. Telephone Rates, Telephone Monitoring, Cell Phone Access, Video Visitation, Securus, Global Tel*Link Corp.
- Ohio Sued by Non-Profit Law Firm for Opening Prisoner Legal Mail, July 15, 2025. Attorney Client, Legal Materials, Attorney Calls, Legal Mail.
- Smart Communications Files for Bankruptcy Protection, June 1, 2025. Telephones, Mail, Legal Mail, Private Phone Contractors.
- A Song for Condemned Alabama Prisoner, April 1, 2025. Witnesses, Telephone Monitoring, Evidence - Failure to Disclose.

