×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
PLRA Filing Fee Provisions Not Retroactive
Loaded on June 15, 1998
published in Prison Legal News
June, 1998, page 12
The court of appeals for the fourth circuit held that the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) that require prisoners filing civil actions or appeals in forma pauperis (IFP) to ultimately pay the filing fees in full, do not apply retroactively. The court further held that the district …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Mis-Managed Health Care in Texas Prisons
- Pelican Bay Cellie Slayings
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Human Rights Watch Condemns Indiana Control Units, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Descent Into Madness: An Inmate's Experience in the New Mexico State Prison Riot, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Prisons and Aids: A Public Health Challenge, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Limiting the Burdens of Pro Se Inmate Litigation, by John Midgley
- New York Prisoner Awarded $56,000 for Beating
- Bureau of Prisons Sexual Abuse Suit Settled for $500,000
- Delay in Medical Treatment States Claim
- Bob Bensing, Hero, Dies Suddenly
- Spokane County Corrections Officials Accused of Cover-up
- PLRA Filing Fee Provisions Not Retroactive
- PLRA Termination Provisions Unconstitutional
- Some PLRA Fee Questions Answered by the Seventh Circuit
- Eighth Circuit Issues PLRA IFP Procedures
- Fatal Mismanagement at Ohio CCA Prison
- California Prison Psychologist Kills Child, Self
- Parolee Must Receive Morrissey Hearing
- $6.5 Million Spent in California Sexual Harassment Suit
- Involuntary Medical Experiments Violate Due Process
- PLN Writer Exiled by CCA
- Illinois Court Access Suit Dismissed
- Refusal of Non-Lethal Injection Kills Arizona Prisoner
- State Weasel Monitors Private Prison Chicken Coop in Texas
- San Francisco City and County Jail Conditions Held Unconstitutional
- Discriminatory Policy Enforcement Actionable
- Michigan's Parole Amendments Constitutional
- Colorado Prisoners Passing Up Parole
- Alabama HIV+ Prisoners Case Remanded Once Again for Proper RA Consideration
- Segregation Conditions Defined for Sandin Purposes
- Attention Veteran Prisoner Activists
- Race Requirement for Religion Struck Down
- Washington Good Time Cap Clarified
- Trial Required in Religious Diet Claim
- Repeal of South Carolina Furlough Law Violates Ex Post Facto
- Beating by Unknown Guards States Claim
- News in Brief
- Vigilante Attack on Prisoner Requires Trial
- Sexual Harassment Actionable
- PA County Medical Co-Payment Constitutional
More from these topics:
- Eighth Circuit Rules Iowa Prisoner’s Adverse Summary Judgment Is Not a “Strike”, March 1, 2026. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Access To Courts.
- Sixth Circuit Clarifies What Constitutes PLRA “Strike” and Reinstates Michigan Prisoner’s Lawsuit, Nov. 1, 2025. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation, Sovereign Immunity, Access To Courts.
- Ninth Circuit Springs California Prisoners from “Catch-22” Reading of PLRA, Oct. 1, 2025. Filing Fees (PLRA), Mental Health.
- Ninth Circuit Refunds Filing Fee to “Struck-Out” California Prisoner Denied Indigent Status Under PLRA, May 1, 2024. Filing Fees (PLRA), Recalling Mandate, Three Strike Litigants.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.

