×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Unknown Defendant Identities
A recent Supreme Court case highlights a problem some prisoners face in finding the exact identities of defendants in civil rights cases. This column discusses this problem and some possible solutions.
In most cases, you must sue individuals and not governmental or corporate entities : In Correctional Services Corp. v. ...
In most cases, you must sue individuals and not governmental or corporate entities : In Correctional Services Corp. v. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Two Private Kentucky Youth Facilities Closed for Abuse, by Gary Hunter
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Unknown Defendant Identities, by John Midgley
- PLN Sues Kansas DOC Over Censorship Policies
- PLN Sues Oregon DOC Over Mail Censorship, Again
- Oregon Prisoners Sue for HCV Treatment
- Court Issues TRO Protecting Constitutional Right to Family Relationships, by David Reutter
- Moore Medical and Prison Industry Leaders Sign Agreements
- Georgia Sheriff Charged in Murder of Successor, by Lonnie Burton
- Deaths in Florida and Virginia Jails Spark National Investigations, by Gary Hunter
- Prison Population Growth Slows Dramatically in 2000
- Illinois Man Awarded $15 Million for 15 Years of Wrongful Imprisonment
- Texas Jail Chaplain Rapes Female Prisoners
- Texas Prisoner Wins $130,000 from Jail for Poor Care, Beatings
- Washington Malpractice Suits Allowed Against Defense Attorneys Despite Alford Plea
- $603,500 in Washington Jail Guard Discrimination Suit
- Wrongly Paroled Texas Prisoner Entitled to Street Time
- Prisoners at Private Federal Prison in California Strike Over Food, Medical Care, by Lonnie Burton
- Schenectady's Jail Strip Search Policy Unconstitutional
- $20,000 Settlement in Montana Jail Strip Search
- Resource Directories
- Deputy Causing Loss of Fingertip States Federal and State Claims
- PLRA Requires Sequential Fee Collection
- Frivolous Dismissal Reviewed Under Abuse of Discretion Standard
- Washington Court of Appeals Adopts Federal "Mailbox Rule"
- Colorado Parole Board Member Busted for Child Porn
- Sanction for Lawyers' Exposing Secret Wackenhut Sexual Abuse Settlement Upheld
- Texas Slavery Upheld Again
- Catalyst Theory Guts Fee Award in Texas Parole Case
- No Jurisdiction for Appeal When Qualified Immunity Not Denied
- No Jurisdiction for Interlocutory Appeal Over Medical Treatment
- Texas Prisoners Have No Absolute Right to Appear in Civil Cases
- No Qualified Immunity in Illinois Denial of Exercise Claim
- Illinois Contraband Law Revisited
- Qualified Immunity, Collateral Orders Not Reviewable on Interlocutory Appeal
- Interview by One Montana Parole Board Member Violates Due Process
- Tenth Circuit Says "Snitch" Label States Eighth Amendment Claim
- Religious Discrimination, Unsanitary Food Suit Denied Summary Judgment
- Alaska Filing Fee Statute Upheld
- Book Review: Dr. Melissa Palmer's Guide To Hepatitis Liver Disease, by Phyllis Beck
- Colorado Denial of Motion to Amend Complaint Reversed
- BOP Finger Amputation States Eighth Amendment Claim
- Alabama Jail Enjoined for "Uncivilized and Hazardous Conditions"
- PLRA Filing Fee Due for Each Separate Appeal
- Ninth Circuit Reverses Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Rules
- News in Brief
More from John Midgley:
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, June 15, 2004
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Magistrate Judges in Federal Courts, Nov. 15, 2003
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Damages, Aug. 15, 2003
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, April 15, 2003
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, Dec. 15, 2002
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Unknown Defendant Identities, July 15, 2002
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, Feb. 15, 2002
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, June 15, 2001
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, Dec. 15, 2000
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, Sept. 15, 2000
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit: No Exception to Due Diligence in Discovery Even for “Conclusive Evidence”, April 1, 2025. Discovery, Suppression of Evidence.
- Qualified Immunity Denied to Former New Mexico Warden in Prisoner’s Sexual Abuse Claim, May 1, 2024. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Discovery, Qualified Immunity, Supervisory Liability, Immunity - Absolute and Qualified.
- $9,000 Settlement in Wisconsin Prisoner’s Heat-Related Illness Suit, April 1, 2024. Failure to Treat, Exposure to Heat, Discovery, Deliberate Indifference.
- Misconduct Shades Sexual Assault Suit As Hawaii Settles With Prisoners for $2 Million, Feb. 1, 2024. Staff-Prisoner Assault, DOC/BOP misconduct, New Trial Motions, Discovery.
- Washington Agencies Sanctioned for Discovery Violations Reach $3.1 Million Settlement with Disabled Woman Allegedly Abused at State Sanctioned Home, Jan. 1, 2024. Attorney Misconduct, Discovery, Sanctions, Discovery - Lateness of.
- Pennsylvania Guards and Their Attorneys Spanked for Discovery Abuse in Prisoner’s Excessive-Force Suit, March 1, 2023. Excessive Force, Discovery.
- Music Stops in Fifth Circuit’s Qualified Immunity ‘Dance,’ Leaving Plaintiffs With Shortened Discovery Period, Jan. 1, 2023. Discovery, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Immunity - Absolute and Qualified, Timeliness of Motion.
- Federal Court Sanctions Wexford for Discovery Abuse in Illinois Prisoner’s Suit, April 1, 2022. Wexford Health Services, Discovery, Brady Rule violations.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Announces Adoption of Framework for Evaluating Discovery Motions Challenging Warrant Affidavits Based on Unidentified Confidential Informants, March 15, 2021. Informants, New Trial Motions, Discovery.
- Global Tel*Link Hit with Sanctions For Discovery Violations in Georgia Prison Call Class Action, Feb. 1, 2021. Contractor Misconduct, Discovery, Telephone Rates, Contractor Liability.