×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Prison Disciplinary Boards Not "Courts" for Habeas Corpus Purposes
Loaded on Nov. 15, 2002
published in Prison Legal News
November, 2002, page 25
Prison Disciplinary Boards not "Courts" for Habeas Corpus Purposes
Filed under:
Disciplinary Litigation,
Civil Procedure,
Appeals,
Mootness,
Habeas Corpus.
Locations:
Indiana,
Tennessee.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held conclusively that prison disciplinary boards lacking a true judicial review process are not "courts" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d), as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). The ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Prisoners, Politics, Money and the Census, by Gary Hunter
- Supreme Court Holds No Immunity for Alabama Hitching Post, by David Reutter
- Attorney Ghost Writing Must Be Disclosed
- The Parents' Project Advocacy for Incarcerated Fathers: What's Missing?, by Denise Johnston
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Michigan Visiting Ruling Upheld
- A Sentence of Their Own, by Hans Sherrer
- New York's Revised "Son of Sam" Law Leads to $100 Million Verdict Against Cop Killer, by Lonnie Burton
- Illinois Jail Guards Acquitted in Killings; California Jail Guard Acquitted in Beating
- $275,000 Awarded in Stun Belt Settlement
- No Fundamental Right to Fee Waiver for Civil Rights Action
- Bureau of Justice Statistics Analyzes Parole Trends
- Virginia Sheriff Investigated for Misuse of Prisoner Funds, by Lonnie Burton
- Pennsylvania Jail Settles Retaliation Suit for $10,000
- Escapes Plague Texas Jails, by Gary Hunter
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap and Local Cost Recovery Rules Upheld in New York Hepatitis C Case, by John E Dannenberg
- Texas Extends 6th Amendment Right to Prisoners: Confidential Attorney Calls Allowed
- Ingram v. Scott Reversed: TDCJ-ID in Compliance with Section 501.008
- Settlement Agreement Reached in Wisconsin Supermax Suit, by John E Dannenberg
- $32,500 Florida Jail Accident Settlement
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Applies to Fees on Fees, by John E Dannenberg
- $1 Damages and $1.50 Attorney Fees in Guard Brutality Suit, by John E Dannenberg
- New York Prisoner's Denial of Exercise Claim Set for Trial
- Washington Pretrial Detainees Have Right to Access Courts
- District Court Sets Prisoner's "Deliberate Indifference" Hepatitis C Claims for Trial
- Prison Disciplinary Boards Not "Courts" for Habeas Corpus Purposes
- Prison Guards Can Be Liable for Prisoner Suicide
- Administrative Exhaustion Required But Unprejudiced; Dismissal and Equitable Tolling, by Gary Hunter
- Defendants' Convenience Justifies Transfer of Venue
- Plaintiff's Disability Impacts Venue
- Advocacy Groups Challenge Arizona Internet Communications Ban
- Judge Approves $9.6 Million Settlement in DC Jail Employees' Sexual Harassment Suit, by Lonnie Burton
- News in Brief
- Mexico Bars Extradition of Criminals Facing Life Sentences
More from these topics:
- On Remand, Eleventh Circuit Clarifies, Affirms Grant of Habeas Relief to Death Row Prisoner, Aug. 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Death Penalty, Death Row.
- Eleventh Circuit Announces Sixth Amendment Right to Proceed Pro Se at Sentencing if Defendant ‘Clearly and Unequivocally’ Expresses Desire to Do So After Faretta Inquiry, Aug. 1, 2025. Mootness, Counsel - Withdrawal/Substitution of, Self-representation.
- Fifth Circuit Announces When Initial § 2255 Petition Not Decided on Merits and Appeals Court Later Recalls Mandate Dismissing Direct Appeal and Affirms Conviction, Subsequent § 2255 Petition Not ‘Second or Successive’ Under AEDPA, Aug. 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA.
- Fourth Circuit Announces Counterman v. Colorado Is New Rule of Constitutional Law That Applies Retroactively to Cases on Collateral Review and Grants Authorization to File Successive § 2255 Motion, July 1, 2025. Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Habeas Corpus, Threats.
- Arguing Successful Federal Habeas Corpus Claims, June 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Sixth Amendment, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Stay and Abeyance of Federal Habeas Petition to Allow Petitioner to Exhaust State Remedies, April 15, 2025. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Amendments to Petition.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.