×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Mental Exam Barred in Discrimination Suit
An employee did not place her mental condition sufficiently "in
controversy" to require her to submit to a mental examination under Rule
35, Fed.R.Civ.P., by alleging emotional distress as an element of damages
in a Title VII discrimination case. While her mental condition is
relevant, Rule 35 requires more than ...
controversy" to require her to submit to a mental examination under Rule
35, Fed.R.Civ.P., by alleging emotional distress as an element of damages
in a Title VII discrimination case. While her mental condition is
relevant, Rule 35 requires more than ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login