×
You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Partial Vacation And Reversal In Federal Seg Case
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit partially vacated and
partially reversed orders in the case involving expungement of record of,
confinement to segregation, and with regard to damages, a remand to
resolve the issue of timely service, issues of parties, prima facie
liability, defenses, and amount of damages. Decision issued without
published opinion. See: Del Raine v. Carlson, 77 F.3d 484 (7th Cir. 1996).
partially reversed orders in the case involving expungement of record of,
confinement to segregation, and with regard to damages, a remand to
resolve the issue of timely service, issues of parties, prima facie
liability, defenses, and amount of damages. Decision issued without
published opinion. See: Del Raine v. Carlson, 77 F.3d 484 (7th Cir. 1996).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Del Raine v. Carlson
| Year | 1996 |
|---|---|
| Cite | 77 F.3d 484 (7th Cir. 1996). |
| Level | Court of Appeals |
| Attorney Fees | 0 |
| Damages | 0 |
| Injunction Status | N/A |
LEXSEE 77 F.3D 484
RONALD DEL RAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORMAN A. CARLSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 94-2595, 94-3101
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
77 F.3d 484; 1996 U.S. App.
November 28, 1995, n1 Submitted
n1 After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court. The notice provided that any party might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34(f). Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and plaintiff's statement that no oral argument is necessary, the appeal is submitted on the record and the briefs.
February 1, 1996, Decided
NOTICE: [*1] RULES OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 79 C 2340. Gerald B. Cohn, Magistrate Judge.
Reported in Full-Text Format at: 1996 U.S. App.
OPINION:
The judgment is VACATED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
RONALD DEL RAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORMAN A. CARLSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 94-2595, 94-3101
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
77 F.3d 484; 1996 U.S. App.
November 28, 1995, n1 Submitted
n1 After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court. The notice provided that any party might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34(f). Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and plaintiff's statement that no oral argument is necessary, the appeal is submitted on the record and the briefs.
February 1, 1996, Decided
NOTICE: [*1] RULES OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 79 C 2340. Gerald B. Cohn, Magistrate Judge.
Reported in Full-Text Format at: 1996 U.S. App.
OPINION:
The judgment is VACATED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.