×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
SVP'S Have No Right To Counsel During Evaluation
Washington State prisoner Alfred E. Kistenmacher appealed a jury's
determination that he is a sexually violent predator (SVP) under RCW 71.09,
and claimed Fifth Amendment violation for not being afforded counsel's
presence during the SVP evaluation.
Kistenmacher was convicted of two counts of first degree child rape. Before
his release ...
determination that he is a sexually violent predator (SVP) under RCW 71.09,
and claimed Fifth Amendment violation for not being afforded counsel's
presence during the SVP evaluation.
Kistenmacher was convicted of two counts of first degree child rape. Before
his release ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login

