The plaintiff did not allege that he was a "qualified individual with a disability" and, in fact, pleaded himself out of court by stating that he is not HIV positive and that all prisoners are required to submit to HIV tests to participate in the program. Thus there is no disability discrimination. He was kept out of the program for refusing to submit to the test. The ADA prohibition on disability-related inquiries applies only to employees; there is no analogous provision in Title II, on which the plaintiff relied.
The plaintiff had no liberty or property interest in attending a cooking class.
The confiscation of property (jeans, styrofoam, and carbon paper) did not deny due process because a post-deprivation remedy was available. See: Murdock v. Washington, 193 F.3d 510 (7th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Murdock v. Washington
|Cite||193 F.3d 510 (7th Cir. 1999)|
|Level||Court of Appeals|