×
You have no more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Dismissal of Doe Defendants Required if Named Defendants Dismissed
The plaintiff sued, invoking 1983, the Moroccan Treaty of 1787, the Free Moorish-American Zodiac Constitution, etc. At 424: "In cases that allow for Doe defendants, other identified defendants have been able to represent the unknown individual defendants' interests." Allowing claims against John Doe defendants to go forward when the other identified defendants had been dismissed would offend due process. See: Bey v. City of Philadelphia, 6 F.Supp.2d 422 (E.D.Pa. 1998).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Bey v. City of Philadelphia
| Year | 1998 |
|---|---|
| Cite | 6 F.Supp.2d 422 (E.D.Pa. 1998) |
| Level | District Court |
| Injunction Status | N/A |