Thomas had initially filed suit for a lost pair of headphones. When documents he requested for use in that case were refused, he filed for a writ of production and ancillary injunction against the BTU guards and director Janie Cockrell of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The case was dismissed as frivolous, and Thomas appealed.
The Court of Appeals of Texas at Texarkana held that since production of the requested documents (related to prison grievances) was discretionary under Texas law, Thomas' claim lacked a basis in law and fact. The appellate court further held that the writ of injunction suggested no course of conduct for the court to review or implement. The trial court’s order of dismissal and finding of frivolousness was affirmed. See: Thomas v. Curry, Case No. 06 03 00087 CV (Tex. App., Nov. 18, 2003); 2003 WL 22707781.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Thomas v. Curry
|Cite||Case No. 06 03 00087 CV (Tex. App., Nov. 18, 2003)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|