The Burford abstention doctrine does not require dismissal, since the statute is not susceptible to a limiting construction.
While the general public and press enjoy a qualified right of access under the First Amendment to criminal proceedings and records of them, the plaintiff had already been given as much access to this recording as the general public had (it was played in court at his trial and he was given a copy of the transcript), and he is entitled to no more. See: Fisher v. King, 232 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2000).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Fisher v. King
|Cite||232 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2000)|
|Level||Court of Appeals|