Even so, in a state trial court the Board recommended a downward departure to level two because Charache had earned a high school diploma in prison and had no prior criminal convictions. The prosecuting attorney argued that those factors had nothing to do with Charache's dangerousness, and that he should be assessed at level three. The court agreed with the prosecutor and Charache appealed.
The Court of Appeals of New York found that Charache had failed to preserve a challenge to the required statutory notice of the state’s “intent to seek a risk level classification different from the Board's recommendation,” and thus the lower court’s findings were affirmed. See: People v. Charache, 9 N.Y.3d 829, 873 N.E.2d 267 (N.Y., 2007).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
People v. Charache
|Cite||9 N.Y.3d 829, 873 N.E.2d 267 (N.Y., 2007)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|