When a supervisor seeks qualified immunity in a section 1983 action, the "clearly established" prong of the qualified immunity inquiry is satisfied when (1) the subordinate's actions violated a clearly established constitutional right, and (2) it was clearly established that a supervisory would be liable for constitutional violations perpetrated by his subordinates in that context.
The psychiatrists who approved the officer's return to work while felony homicide charges were pending against him, shortly after he had threatened to kill another police officer, conducting their examination in a cursory fashion that violated their own procedures, could be held liable for the officer's actions and were not entitled to qualified immunity. See: Camilo-Robles v. Hoyos, 151 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1998).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Camilo-Robles v. Hoyos
|Cite||151 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1998)|
|Level||Court of Appeals|