On appeal, the Court of Appeal of California, 6th Appellate District, found that the jury might have found that the three incidents were the result of one agreement between Jasso and Ruben to smuggle the drugs. On that basis, Jasso's convictions were vacated and the case remanded to the trial court. See: California v. Jasso, 142 Cal.App.4th 1213, 48 Cal.Rptr.3d 697 (Cal.App. 6 Dist., 2006).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
California v. Jasso
|Cite||142 Cal.App.4th 1213, (Cal.App. 6 Dist., 2006)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|