×
You have 1 more free article available this month. Subscribe today.
Statute of Limitations May Toll While Prisoner Exhausts Administrative Remedies
In 2003, William Howell, a Georgia state prisoner, sued jail guards in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for an incident that occurred over two years before he filed suit. Since the applicable statute of limitations was two years, the district court dismissed the case as time-barred.
On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit considered Howell?s argument that the statute of limitations should be tolled because the guards had precluded him from exhausting his administrative remedies by not answering his grievances. Since such exhaustion was a prerequisite to filing suit, Howell argued that the statute of limitations should be tolled for the time it took him to do so.
The 11th Circuit found the record to be inadequate to decide the matter and remanded the case to the district court for fact finding and conclusion on the issue. See: Howell v. Proctor, 136 Fed.Appx. 267 (11th Cir. 2005).
On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit considered Howell?s argument that the statute of limitations should be tolled because the guards had precluded him from exhausting his administrative remedies by not answering his grievances. Since such exhaustion was a prerequisite to filing suit, Howell argued that the statute of limitations should be tolled for the time it took him to do so.
The 11th Circuit found the record to be inadequate to decide the matter and remanded the case to the district court for fact finding and conclusion on the issue. See: Howell v. Proctor, 136 Fed.Appx. 267 (11th Cir. 2005).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Howell v. Proctor
| Year | 2005 |
|---|---|
| Cite | 136 Fed.Appx. 267 (11th Cir. 2005) |
| Level | Court of Appeals |
| Injunction Status | N/A |