Approximately 22 of the sought documents were withheld by the PPD on grounds that they were "inter or intra agency communications." The Church sought disclosure in an action to compel pursuant to A.R.S. § 39 121. The court's in camera inspection determined the documents exempt from disclosure. The Church appealed and the PPD argued that disclosure would affect the efficient functioning of law enforcement agencies.
The Division One Court of Appeals of Arizona held that no specific state exemption
existed. It was held that disclosure posed no harm and that the documents were discloseable
under the federal Freedom of Information Act. The court further noted that it was reluctant
to thwart disclosure provisions for possible "self serving" governmental officials' inclinations. The dissent would have affirmed the denial to control "the free flow of information...among police agencies." See: Church of Scientology v. City of Phoenix Police. Department. 122 Ariz. 338, 594 P.2d 1034 (Ariz. App. 1979).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Church of Scientology v. City of Phoenix Police. Department
|Cite||122 Ariz. 338, 594 P.2d 1034 (Ariz. App. 1979)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|