On appeal, the Court of Appeals of Indiana, 1st District, found that the fact that the subpoenas might be investigatory records, without more, wasn’t enough to exempt them from disclosure under the APDA. On that basis, the Court reversed the trial court and remanded the case for further proceedings. See: In re Subpoenas Issued Relative to Vanderburgh County Treasurer’s Office Investigation; The Evansville Courier v. Prosecutor, Vanderburgh 499 N.E.2d 286 (1986).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login