On appeal, the Court of Appeals of Michigan found that the records were subject to disclosure under the FOIA. It also found that the DOC pretended no to understand Kincaid's repeated requests so it could deny him the documents.
Thus, the Court categorically agreed with the trial court and affirmed its judgment in all respects. See: Kincaid v. Department of Corrections, 130 Mich.App. 175; 446 N.W.2d 604 (1989).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Kincaid v. Department of Corrections
|Cite||130 Mich.App. 175; 446 N.W.2d 604 (1989)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|