×
You have no more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
HIV Status Allows Plaintiff to Proceed Anonymously
The plaintiff was arrested, told the police he was HIV positive, and they put a pink sign saying HIV POSITIVE INMATE on his cell door in the police lockup (this in 1997!).
The fact that a case involves a medical issue or embarrassing facts is not ordinarily cause for proceeding pseudonymously. However, the plaintiff's HIV status is "a compelling reason for allowing him to proceed under a pseudonym. I believe that in modern society one's HIV-positive status, unlike most other medical conditions, is still considered a stigma." (1129) The plaintiff is not entitled to a protective order requiring his previously filed notices of claim to be placed under seal. See: Roe v. City of Milwaukee, 37 F.Supp.2d 1127 (E.D.Wis. 1999).
The fact that a case involves a medical issue or embarrassing facts is not ordinarily cause for proceeding pseudonymously. However, the plaintiff's HIV status is "a compelling reason for allowing him to proceed under a pseudonym. I believe that in modern society one's HIV-positive status, unlike most other medical conditions, is still considered a stigma." (1129) The plaintiff is not entitled to a protective order requiring his previously filed notices of claim to be placed under seal. See: Roe v. City of Milwaukee, 37 F.Supp.2d 1127 (E.D.Wis. 1999).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login