Furthermore, Fox ordered the closure of the unit library and the screening of the library’s inventory to cull any books that violated the obscenity ban. The screening culminated in the purging of 21% of the library’s stock.
Cline’s attorney, Robert Bastress, Esq., of West Virginia University College of Law in Morgantown, argued the Policy Directive and the warden’s actions were unconstitutional in that they restricted Cline’s right to information by purging the library. Cline and Fox filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and, on May 7, 2004, the court granted Cline’s motion in regard to the purge. Additionally, the court enjoined the enforcement of P.D. 503.00(V)(P) and ordered that it be amended “in a manner consistent with this court’s orders and other governing federal law.” See: Cline v. Fox, et al., 319 F. Supp. 2d 685 (N.D.W.Va. 2004).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Cline v. Fox, et al.
|Cite||319 F. Supp. 2d 685 (N.D.W.Va. 2004)|