On appeal, the court determined the lid was easily capable of causing “substantial bodily harm” as it was used in this instance, and, therefore, was correctly characterized as a deadly weapon. See: Wash. v. D.A.C., Wash. App., Div. III, # 27866-2-III.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Washinton v. D.A.C.
|Cite||Wash. App., Div. III, # 27866-2-III|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|