Hooper and Felice appealed the decision, stating the court had no authority to impose the additional requirements as conditions for relieving them of their duty to register. On appeal, after review of the pertinent statute, RCW 9A.44.140(4), it was determined the trial court had erred by imposing such requirements. Therefore, the lower court’s decision was reversed and remanded for further proceedings. See: State v. Hooper, 154 Wash.App. 428, 225 P.3d 446 (Wash.App. Div. 3 2010).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
State v. Hooper
|Cite||154 Wash.App. 428, 225 P.3d 446 (Wash.App. Div. 3 2010)|
|Level||State Court of Appeals|