For nearly 30 years, the prevailing view amongst the Court of Appeals was that Exemption 2 applied to any “predominantly internal” documents. Citing this construction of Exemption 2, the plaintiff was denied copies of maps and explosives data in possession of the Navy.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed. By applying Exemption 2 to any “predominately internal” documents, the Court held, the lower courts had essentially read the “personnel” aspect of Exemption 2 out of the statutes. “Exemption 2, consistent with the plain meaning of the term ‘personnel rules and practices,’ encompasses only records relating to issues of employee relations and human resources,” the Court wrote. See: Milner v. Department of the Navy, 131 S.Ct. 1259 (2011).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Milner v. Department of the Navy
|Cite||131 S.Ct. 1259 (2011)|