Applying the rational-basis test to Harbin-Bey's equal protection claim, the Court found that it was not arbitrary to afford hearings to prisoners prior to designating them as "escape risks" or "homosexual predators" but not prior to designating them as STG members. The Court also found that STG designation was not sufficiently adverse to warrant due process protections.
The Court similarly dispensed with Harbin-Bey's claims that prison officials (1) violated his right to access to the courts, (2) infringed upon his First Amendment right to receive periodicals, and (3) retaliated against him for filing grievances. See: Harbin-Bey v. Rutter, 420 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2005).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Harbin-Bey v. Rutter
|Cite||420 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2005)|
|Level||Court of Appeals|