Fifty State Misconduct Checklist Sex With Prisoners 2007
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Alabama Custodial Sexual Misconduct ALA. CODE § 14-11-31 (2006). √ Alaska Sexual assault in the first degree. ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.410 (2006). Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Volunteers not covered √ √ Volunteers not covered √ √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ √2 Contractors covered explicitly √1 Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense √ √3 Sexual assault in the second degree. ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.420 (2006). ∗ The requirements for sex offender registration vary from state to state. For more detailed information concerning both adult and juvenile sex offender registration, please refer to NIC/WCL Project’s “Fifty State Survey of Sex Offender Registration Laws and Registrable Offenses ”, “Fifty State Summary of Juvenile Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Requirements”, “Summary of State Sex Offender Registration Requirements for Adults” developed under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1. ∗ Facilities which are covered explicitly in the language of the statute include closed confinement facilities such as prisons or jails, juvenile facilities, community corrections and contract facilities. ∗ Employees which are covered explicitly include correctional officers and administrators, any paid employees, volunteers, and contract employees. Note, however, that all employees may not be covered under the sexual assault law. ∗ All forms of sexual misconduct would include sexual penetration by a body part or an object, regardless of the sex of the parties or what part of the body the penetration occurred, and sexual touching or contact. ∗ Community corrections vary from place to place and while staff sexual misconduct laws generally cover probation and/or parole, the law may not cover other community settings or supervision (ie. half-way houses, pre-release centers, therapeutic etc.). It is important to check how community corrections is organized in your state and locally. Please refer to NIC/WCL Project’s “Fifty State Survey of Community Corrections Agencies” developed under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 for an overview of the structure of community corrections’ agencies in each state. 1 In Alabama, contract employees are covered. ALA. CODE § 14-11-30(b)(2) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 1 of 23 Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Volunteers not covered √4 √ √ Volunteers not covered √7 √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly √5 √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony Alaska con’t Sexual assault in the third degree. ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.425 (2006). Sexual assault in the fourth degree. ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.427 (2006). Arizona Unlawful sexual conduct; correctional employees; prisoners; classification ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-1419. (2006). Arkansas √ √ 2 √8 In Alaska, juveniles are implicitly covered under the law. The law applies to victims who by “authority of law” are under the care of the offender. ALASKA STAT. §§ 11.41.410(a) & 11.41.420(a). 3 In Alaska, the definition of “position of authority” includes probation officers. ALASKA STAT. § 11.41.470(5). 4 In Arizona, masturbatory contact is covered. ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-1401 (2006). 5 In Arizona, the law covers individuals under the supervision of the department, city or county and an offender who is on release status and who is under the supervision of the state department of corrections. ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 13-1419A & 13-1419B (2006). 6 In Arizona, the inmate is also penalized for the misconduct. ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 13-1419B (2006). 7 In Arkansas, sexual contact is only punishable if the victim is less than 18. ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-14-124(a)(1) (2006). 8 In Arkansas, contactors are only covered when the victim is less than 18. ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-14-124(a)(1) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 2 of 23 √6 √ √ √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ √ √9 √ 10 √ Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ Arkansas con’t Sexual assault in the first degree. ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-14-124 (2006). Sexual Assault in the second degree ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-14-125 (2006). Sexual assault in the third degree ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-14-126 (2006). California Employee or officer of detention facility; Engaging in sexual activity with consenting adult confined in √ 9 √ California also covers rooms used for holding persons for interviews, interrogations, or investigations, court holding facilities and during transport of confined persons. CAL. PENAL CODE § 289.6(3)(c) (2006). 10 In California, the statute covers persons over the age of consent housed in juvenile facilities. Thus, the statute covers sexual activity with a “consenting adult” in a juvenile facility, not juveniles in juvenile facilities. Presumably, sexual offenses involving juveniles under the age of consent can be prosecuted under statutory rape or other sexual assault laws. The legislative history of the statute also suggests that the California Assembly was concerned with sexual activity with “consenting adults.” No mention was made to juvenile victims, presumably because legislators knew that ANY sex between staff and juvenile inmates was already proscribed by law. Therefore, it was unnecessary to enact additional legislation criminalizing sexual activity between staff and juvenile inmates in their charge. Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 3 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony California con’t detention facility. CAL. PENAL CODE § 289.6 (2006). Colorado Unlawful Sexual Contact. COLO REV. STAT. § 18-3-404 (2006). Sexual Conduct in Penal Institutions. COLO REV. STAT. § 18-7-701 (2006). Connecticut Sexual assault in the second degree: Class C or B felony. CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-71 (2006). √ √ √ Volunteers not covered 12 √ √ 11 √ √ 13 √ 14 √ √ √ 15 √ Sexual assault in the fourth degree: Class A misdemeanor or Class D felony. CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-73a (2006). 11 In Colorado, the statute implicitly covers juveniles. The statute applies to those in the “custody of law” or “detained in an institution.” Note however that the offending staff must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. COLO REV. STAT. § 18-3-404 (2006). 12 In Connecticut, the offender must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-71(a)(5) & 53a-73a(a)(1)(E) (2006). 13 In Connecticut, the statute implicitly covers juveniles because the law protects those in the “custody of law” or “detained in an institution.” CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-71(a)(5) & 53a-73a(a)(1)(E) (2006). 14 See State v. Straub, 1999 Conn. Super LEXIS 746 (holding that the statutory phrase "in custody of law" covered persons beyond those confined and included persons committed by the court to supervision by the probation department, and that the alleged victims were therefore in custody while on probation). 15 In Connecticut, the law covers “other institutions.” CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-71 (2006) & CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53a-73a (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 4 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Delaware Sexual relations in detention facility; Class G felony DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 1259 (2006). District of Columbia First degree sexual abuse of a ward. D.C. CODE ANN. § 22-3013 (LexisNexis 2006). Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly Volunteers and contractors are not covered Sexual contact is not covered √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ √ √ 17 Volunteers not covered 18 √ √ √ √ √ Volunteers not covered Sexual contact is not covered √ √ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities √ 19 √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ 16 √ √ √ √ Consent is NOT a defense Second degree sexual abuse of a ward. D.C. CODE ANN. § 22-3014 (2006). Florida Authorized use of 16 17 √ 20 In Delaware, the inmate is penalized for the misconduct. DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 1259 (2006). D.C. includes sexual misconduct that occurs during transportation, medical diagnosis or treatment, court appearances, work and recreation. D.C. CODE § 22- 3001(6)(b) (2006). 18 In D.C., the offender must have “supervisory or disciplinary authority” over the victim. D.C. CODE § 22-3013 & 22-3014 (2006). In D.C., contractors are implied because the statute covers those individuals in “official custody” or in an “institution.” D.C. CODE § 22-3013 & 22-3014 (2006). 20 In Florida, private facilities are implicitly covered in the law because § 794.011(g) covers misconduct that occurs in a “similar setting” which could include private facilities. FLA. STAT. ANN. § 794.011(4)(g) (2006). Also, employing agency is defined as “any private entity which has contracted with the state or county for the operation and maintenance of a non-juvenile detention facility.” FLA. STAT. ANN. § 943.10(4) (2006). 19 Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 5 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Volunteers not covered 21 √ Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ √ 22 √ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ Florida con’t Force; malicious battery & sexual misconduct prohibited; reporting required; penalties FLA. STAT. ANN. § 944.35 (2006). Sexual battery. FLA. STAT. ANN. § 794.011 (2006). Georgia Sexual assault against persons in custody; sexual assault against person detained or patient in hospital or other institution; sexual assault by practitioner of psychotherapy against patient. GA. CODE ANN. § 16-6-5.1 (2006). 21 √ 23 In Georgia, the offender must have “supervisory or disciplinary authority” over the victim. GA. CODE ANN. § 16-6-5.1(c) (2006). In Georgia, an offender can be guilty of staff sexual misconduct if they have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim and the victim is in the custody of law. Youths are referred to the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice by the juvenile courts and thus under the custody of law. GA. CODE ANN. § 16-65.1(b) & (c) (2006). 23 In Georgia, contractors can be implicitly covered under the law because the statute covers individuals under the “custody of law”, regardless of the employment status of the actor. GA. CODE ANN. § 16-6-5.1(c) (2006). 22 Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 6 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ √ √ Volunteers not covered √ Idaho Sexual contact with a prisoner. IDAHO CODE ANN. § 18-6110 (2006). √ Not cover juveniles facilities Volunteers not covered Sexual contact is not covered √ Illinois Custodial Sexual Misconduct 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 5/11-9.2 (2006). √ Volunteers not covered √ 25 √ Hawaii Sexual assault in the second degree. Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 707-731 (2006). Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ 24 Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly √ √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Sexual assault in the third degree. HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 707-732 (2006). Indiana Sexual misconduct by service provider with detainee √ √ √ √ 24 √ √ 26 √ √ √ √ In Hawaii, juveniles are implicitly covered under the statute because Hawaii places juveniles in youth correctional facilities. The language of the statute covers individuals in any state correctional facility. HAW. REV. STAT. §§ 707-731 & 707-732 (2006). 25 Illinois notes that the “[e]vidence of emission of semen is not required to prove sexual penetration.” 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 5/12-12(F) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 7 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Indiana con’t IND. CODE ANN. § 35-44-1-5 (2006). Iowa Sexual misconduct with offenders and juveniles IOWA CODE § 709.16 (2006). Kansas Unlawful sexual relations. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 21-3520 (2006). Kentucky Sexual Abuse in the Second Degree. KY. REV. STAT. ANN. § 510.120 (2006). Louisiana Malfeasance in office; sexual conduct prohibited with persons Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ √ √ √ 27 √ √ √ Volunteers not covered 29 √ √ 30 √ Community Corrections facilities are not covered Community Corrections employees are not covered √ √ Contract facilities and community corrections Volunteers not covered √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly √ 28 √ √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities √ √ Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ √ 31 Contract employees 26 In Indiana, the statute covers all entities who “provides goods or services.” IND. CODE ANN. § 35-44-1-5(a) (2006). In Iowa, sexual contact of the breasts is not covered. IOWA CODE § 702.17 (2006). 28 In Iowa, the statute covers all “agents of the Department of Corrections.” Probation and parole are under the Department of Corrections. IOWA CODE § 709.16 (2006). 29 In Kansas, a community corrections officer will be liable if the inmate is under direct supervision and control of the offending officer. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 21-3520 27 (2006). 30 See State v. Fike, 243 Kansas 365 (1988)(stating that a number of sexual assault statutes indicate 16 as the age of consent). Thus, the staff sexual misconduct statute in Kansas covers juvenile facilities but not juveniles. This law is similar to California’s. See KAN. STAT. ANN. § 21-3520 (6)(B) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 8 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Louisiana con’t confined in correctional institutions. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 14:134.1 (2006). Maine Gross sexual assault. Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ facilities are not covered not covered Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ √ 33 √ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony Community Corrections employees not covered √ √ Volunteers not covered 32 √ √ 34 ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 253 (2006). Unlawful sexual contact ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 255-A 1.E (2006). Unlawful sexual touching ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 260.1-E (2006). 31 In Louisiana, the Youth Services department is within the Department of Public Safety and Corrections. Therefore, the language of the law implicitly covers juvenile facilities. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 14:134.1(A) (2006). 32 In Maine, the offender must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 253(2)(E) & 17-A, § 260(1)(E) (2006). 33 In Maine, the law covers victims who are detained in an institution and offenders who have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. Thus, juvenile institutions may be implicitly included in the coverage of the law. ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 253(2)(E) & 17-A, § 260(1)(E) (2006). 34 In Maine, the statute implicitly covers contractors because the law punishes staff sexual misconduct in “other institutions.” ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 253(2)(E) & 17-A, § 260(1)(E) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 9 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Maryland Sexual conduct between correctional or Department of Juvenile Services employee and inmate or confined child. Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Volunteers not covered √ √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ Contractors not covered MD. CODE ANN., CRIM. LAW § 3-314 (2006). Massachusetts Punishments for sexual relations with inmate. MASS. ANN. LAWS ch. 268, § 21A (2006). Michigan Criminal sexual conduct in the second degree; felony. MICH. COMP. LAWS SERV. § 750.520c (2006). Covers all Facilities ∗ √ Juvenile facilities and community corrections facilities are not covered √ Volunteers not covered √ √ √ 36 √ √ 35 √ √ 35 √ √ Covers private vendors that operate youth correctional facilities. 37 In Massachusetts, juveniles can be placed in correctional institutions. Correctional institutions are covered under the law and thus the law implicitly covers juveniles. MASS. ANN. LAWS ch. 268, §21A (2006). 36 In Michigan, the law specifically addresses inappropriate sexual contact that occurs during medical examination or treatment. MICH. COMP. LAWS SERV. § 750.520b(1)(f)(iv) (2006). 37 See § 750.520c(1)(f)-(k) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 10 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Minnesota Criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ √ √ √ √ Juvenile detention facilities not covered √ Sexual contact is not covered √ 39 √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly √ 38 √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense √ √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ √ √ √ MINN. STAT. § 609.344 (2006). Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree. MINN. STAT. § 609.345 (2006). Mississippi Crime of sexual activity between law enforcement or correctional personnel and prisoners; sanctions. MISS. CODE ANN. § 97-3-104 (2006). Missouri Sexual contact with an inmate, penalty -consent not a defense Community Corrections not covered √ Juvenile detention facilities not covered √ √ 40 MO. REV. STAT. § 566.145 (amended 2006) (current version at 2006 Mo. 38 In Minnesota, the statute covers specific facilities, but also adds that the statute is “not limited” to those institutions. The statute also covers “work release” and individuals “under supervision.” MINN. STAT. § 609.344(a)(m) & 609.345(1) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 11 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Missouri con’t HB 1698 (2006)). Montana Sexual assault MONT. CODE ANN. § 45-5-502 (2006). Nebraska Sexual abuse of an inmate or parolee. Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Community Corrections facilities not covered √ 41 √ √ √ Volunteers not covered √ 42 Juveniles covered implicitly √ 43 Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ √ √ √ Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities NEB. REV. STAT. ANN. § 28-322.01 (2006). Sexual abuse of an inmate or parolee in the first degree; penalty NEB. REV. STAT. 28322.02 (2006). Sexual abuse of an inmate or parolee in the second degree; penalty NEB. REV. STAT. § 28-322.03 (2006). 39 40 In Missouri, the law implicitly covers volunteers because the law covers those “assigned to work.” 2006 Mo. HB 1698 (2006). In Missouri, the law implicitly covers contractors because the definition of offender includes any person in the custody of a correctional facility. 2006 Mo. HB 1698 (2006). 41 42 In Montana, the individual must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. MONT. CODE ANN. § 45-5-502(5)(a) (2006). In Nebraska, the emission of semen is not required to satisfy the act of sexual penetration. NEB. REV. STAT. ANN. § 28-318(6) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 12 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Nevada Voluntary sexual conduct between prisoner and another person; penalty. NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 212.187 (2006). New Hampshire Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 632-A2: (2006). Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ √ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Community corrections is not cover ed 44 Community Corrections is not covered √ 45 √ 49 √ 50 Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ 46 √ Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ 48 √ √ √ 47 √ √ 51 Volunteers not covered Felonious Sexual Assault. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 632-A3: (2006). 43 In Nebraska, the statute covers those individuals confined in a correctional institution. Juveniles are confined in the Nebraska Correctional Youth Facility under the Nebraska Department of Corrections. Thus, juveniles are implicitly covered under the statute. NEB. REV. STAT. ANN. § 28-322.01 (2006). 44 In Nevada, community corrections is explicitly excluded from the coverage of the law. NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 212.187 (2006). 45 In Nevada, the law covers masturbation. NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 212.187(3)(a) (2006). 46 In the Nevada code, the Juvenile Correctional Institutions section (Chapter 210), falls under correctional Institutions (Title 16), along with the Offenses relating to Prisons and Prisoners (chapter 212) and the Department of Corrections (209), and that Prisoner is defined for all of Title 16. 47 In Nevada, contractors are implicitly covered under the law because the statute punishes “a person” who engages in sexual misconduct, regardless of the employment status of that person. NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 212.187(2) (2006). 48 In Nevada, the inmate is penalized for the misconduct. NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 212.187(2) (2006). 49 In New Hampshire, the actor must be in a position of authority over the victim and have direct supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. The law makes no distinction between employees or contractors. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 632-A:2(n)(1) & (2) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 13 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE New Jersey Sexual assault Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ √ √ N.M. STAT. ANN. § 30-9-11 (2006). New York Sexual misconduct. NY PENAL LAW § 130.20 (2006). Rape in the third degree. NY PENAL LAW § 130.25 (Consol. 2006). Forcible touching. NY PENAL LAW § 130.52 (2006). Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly 52 Sexual contact is not covered √ Volunteers not covered Sexual contact is not covered 54 √ 57 √ √ Volunteers not covered N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:14-2 (2006). New Mexico Criminal sexual penetration. Covers all Employees ∗ √ Community corrections is not covered √ 56 Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ √ Contractors covered explicitly √ 53 Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ 55 √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense √ Volunteers not covered Health care contractors are covered. Other contracted employees are not. 50 In New Hampshire, the emission of semen is not required to complete the act of sexual assault. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 632-A:1(v)(h) (2006). In New Hampshire, contractors are implicitly covered under the language “actor.” N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 632-A:1(I) (2006). 52 In New Jersey, the actor must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:14-2 (2006). 53 In New Jersey, the statute covers actors who have “supervisory or disciplinary power over the person by virtue of the actor’s legal professional or occupational status.” N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:14-2(a) & (c) (2006). 54 In New Mexico, emission of semen is not required to complete the act of sexual penetration. N.M. STAT. ANN. § 30-9-11(A) (2006). 55 In New Mexico, the statute implicitly covers contractors because the law holds those “in a position of authority” accountable and protects inmates “confined in a correctional facility.” N.M. STAT. ANN. § 30-9-11(D)(2) (2006). 51 Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 14 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE New York con’t Sexual abuse in the second degree. NY PENAL LAW § 130.60 (2006). North Carolina Intercourse and sexual offenses with certain victims; consent no defense N.C. GEN. STAT. § 14-27.7 (2006). North Dakota Sexual abuse of wards. N.D. CENT. CODE § Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ √ Volunteers not covered Sexual contact is not covered √ √ Community Corrections is not covered 58 √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ 60 Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ √ 61 Volunteers not covered 59 56 New York does not have contracted correctional facilities. Thus all facilities are covered under the law. In New York, employees who perform professional duties including providing custody, medical or mental health services, counseling services, educational programs or vocational training are covered under the statute. NY PENAL LAW § 130.05(3)(c)(i) (2006). 58 In North Dakota, the statute does not implicitly cover community corrections. See State v. Ennis, 464 N.W. 2d 378 (1990)(holding that time on probation is not "time spent in custody" within the meaning of N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-32-02 and time on parole, too, is not "time spent in custody" within the meaning of § 12.132-02). 59 In North Dakota, the offender must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim. N.D. CENT. CODE § 12.1-20-06 & 12.1-20-07 (2006). 57 Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 15 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly √ √ 62 Sexual contact is not covered √ 63 √ 64 Sexual contact is not covered √ 66 √ 67 Contractors covered explicitly Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities √ 65 √ √ √ √ North Dakota con’t 12.1-20-06 (2006). Sexual assault. N.D. CENT. CODE § 12.1-20-07 (2006). Ohio Sexual Battery, OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2907.03 (2006). Oklahoma Rape Defined OKLA. STAT. tit. 21, § 1111 (2005). Volunteers not covered √ √ Volunteers not covered √ Rape in the first degree - second 60 In North Dakota, The Division of Juvenile Justice is a division of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Since the language of the statute covers all institutions, it can be implied that juvenile facilities are covered. N.D. CENT. CODE § 12.1-20-06 & 12.1-20-07 (2006). 61 In North Dakota, contractors are implicitly covered under the language “other institution”, which could include private facilities. N.D. CENT. CODE § 12.1-20-06 & 12.1-20-07 (2006). 62 In Ohio, the offender must have supervisory or disciplinary authority over the victim or be an employee of a detention facility. OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2907.03 (2006). 63 In Ohio, the law covers victims who are in the “custody of law”. Since juveniles are in the custody of law when they are adjudicated, the law implicitly covers juveniles. The Department of Youth Services is a separate entity from the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2907.03 (2006). 64 See State v. Thompson, 33 Ohio St. 3d 1 (1987)(stating that both probationers and parolees have been held to possess U.S. Const. amend. IV rights more limited than other people, because they are considered to be in the constructive, as opposed to actual or physical, custody of the state at all times during their probation or parole). 65 In Ohio, the law applies to victims in “institutions”, “in the custody of law” and indicates that “no person” shall engage in sexual misconduct. Thus, contractors are implicitly covered under the statute. OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2907.03 (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 16 of 23 State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Youth Detention Facilities not covered Volunteers not covered √ √ Volunteers not covered √ Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ √ 68 √ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ Oklahoma con’t degree OKLA. STAT. tit.21, § 1114 (2006). Forcible sodomy OKLA. STAT. tit. 21, § 888 (2006). Oregon First Degree Custodial Sexual Misconduct OR. REV. STAT. § 163.452 (2006). √ Second Degree Custodial Sexual Misconduct OR. REV. STAT. § 163.454 (2006). Pennsylvania Institutional sexual assault 18 PA. CONS. STAT. § 3124.2 (2006). √ √ √ 69 66 √ 70 In Oklahoma, the law applies to victims under the “legal custody or supervision” of a state agency and employees of state agencies that “exercise[] authority over the victim.” An adjudicated juvenile would be under the legal custody of the state and the state would exercise authority over them. Thus, the law implicitly includes juveniles. OKLA. STAT. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(7) (2006). 67 In Oklahoma, the law applies to victims under the “legal custody or supervision” of a state agency and employees of state agencies that “exercise[] authority over the victim.” An individual on parole or probation would be under the legal supervision of the state. Thus, the law implicitly covers community corrections. OKLA. STAT. tit. 21, § 1111(A)(7) (2006). 68 In Oregon, the law covers juveniles in youth correctional facilities and not detention facilities. OR. REV. STAT. § 163.452(A)(A)(B) & 163.454(1)(A)(B) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 17 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Rhode Island Correctional employees — sexual relations with inmates Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles not covered Volunteers not covered 71 Sexual contact is not covered Juveniles are not covered √ √ Community Corrections is not covered Volunteers not covered Sexual contact is not covered Juveniles covered explicitly Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly √ 72 √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ felony R.I. GEN. LAWS § 11-25-24 (2006). South Carolina Sexual misconduct with an inmate, patient or offender S.C. CODE ANN. § 44-23-1150 (2006). South Dakota Sexual acts prohibited between prison employees and prisoners. S.D. CODIFIED LAWS § 24-1-26.1 (2006). √ √ 73 √ √ Contractors are not covered 69 In Pennsylvania, community corrections is under the Department of Corrections. Thus, community corrections’ staff would be considered “employee[s] of the Department of Corrections.” 18 PA. CONS. STAT. § 3124.2(a) (2006) 70 In Pennsylvania, the law covers youth contract facilities. 18 PA. CONS. STAT. § 3142.2(b) (2006). 71 In Rhode Island, emission of semen is not required to complete the act of sexual penetration. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 11-37-1(8) (2006). 72 In Rhode Island, the Division of Rehabilitative Services includes probation and parole and is under the Department of Corrections. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 11-25-24 (2006). 73 In South Carolina, the law covers parole, probation and other community supervision programs. S.C. CODE ANN. §44-23-1150(A)(1) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 18 of 23 √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Tennessee Sexual contact with inmates TENN. CODE ANN. § 39-16-408 (2006). Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Community Corrections is not covered √ 74 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Juvenile facilities are not √ √ √ √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ Sexual battery by an authority figure TENN. CODE ANN. § 39-13-527 (2006). Texas Violations of the Civil Rights of Person in Custody; Improper Sexual Activity with person in custody. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 39.04 (2006). Utah Custodial sexual relations – custodial sexual misconduct – definitions – penalties – defenses UTAH CODE ANN. § 76-5-412 (2006). Vermont SEXUAL EXPLOITATION 74 75 √ 75 In Tennessee, emission of semen is not required to complete the act of sexual penetration. TENN. CODE ANN. § 39-13-501(7) (2006). In Texas, the law covers only juvenile facilities. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 39.04(e)(2) (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 19 of 23 √ √ √ √ √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Vermont con’t OF AN INMATE VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 13, § 3257 (2006). Virginia Carnal knowledge of an inmate, parolee, probationer, or pretrial or post-trial offender; penalty. VA. CODE ANN. § 18.2-64.2 (2006). Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Sexual contact is not covered √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony covered √ √ √ Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 20 of 23 √ √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Washington Custodial sexual misconduct in the first degree WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 9A.44.160 (2006). Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ √ √ Volunteer s not covered Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly √ 76 √ Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities Custodial sexual misconduct in the second degree WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 9A.44.170 (2006). 76 In Washington, community corrections is implicitly covered since the statute protects those under “correctional supervision” and community corrections is under the Department of Corrections. WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 9A.44.160 (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 21 of 23 Consent is NOT a defense √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly West Virginia Imposition of sexual intercourse or sexual intrusion on incarcerated persons; penalty W. VA. CODE ANN. § 61-8B-10 (2006). √ √ Volunteers not covered √ √ √ Wisconsin Second Degree Sexual Assault Wis. Stat. Ann. § 940.225 (2006). Wyoming Sexual assault in the second degree WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-2-303 (2006). √ √ √ √ 77 √ √ √ Volunteer s not covered Sexual contact is not covered 78 √ 79 Community Corrections Covered implicitly Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities √ √ √ 80 77 √ 81 In Wisconsin, the emission of semen is not required. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 940.225(5)(c) (2006). In Wyoming, the emission of semen is not required. WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-2-301 (2006). 79 In Wyoming the law covers “custodians” and those who have “significant influence over a person”. Thus, implicitly including those who correctional administrators who are employed at juvenile justice agencies. WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-2-301(a)(iv) (2006). 80 In Wyoming the law covers “custodians” and those who have “significant influence over a person”. Thus, implicitly including those who correctional administrators who are employed in community corrections. WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-2-301(a)(iv) (2006). 81 In Wyoming the law implicitly covers contractors since the language of the statute includes “any actor”. However, the offender must occupy a position of authority over the victim. WYO. STAT. ANN. § 6-2-303 (2006). 78 Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 22 of 23 √ Some forms are penalized as a felony √ √ √ Consent is NOT a defense √ State Laws Prohibiting Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody Check-List NIC/WCL Project On Addressing Prison Rape STATE United States Aggravated sexual abuse 18 U.S.C.S. § 2241 (2006). Requires Sex Offender Registration ∗ Covers all Facilities ∗ Covers all Employees ∗ Covers all forms of Sexual Misconduct ∗ Juveniles covered explicitly √ √ √ √ √ Juveniles covered implicitly Community Corrections covered explicitly ∗ Community Corrections Covered implicitly Sexual abuse 18 U.S.C.S. § 2242 (2006). Sexual abuse of a minor or ward 18 U.S.C.S. § 2243 (2006). Abusive sexual contact 18 U.S.C.S. § 2244 (2006). Developed by the NIC/WCL Project on Addressing Prison Rape under Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 Accurate as of January 4, 2007 Page 23 of 23 Contractors covered explicitly Contractors covered implicitly Covers private facilities √ Consent is NOT a defense Some forms are penalized as a felony √