Survey Examines Victimization Inside Prisons Center for Behavioral Health Sciences and Criminal Justice Research Rutgers 2008
Download original document:

Document text

Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Policy Brief Survey Examines Victimization inside Prisons Concern about victimization inside prisons and jails has been growing at the same time that the number of people with mental illness residing in these facilities has increased. This double spiral is troubling because, as research indicates, rates of victimization are elevated for people with serious mental illness living in community and psychiatric settings. Furthermore—although empirical evidence has been lacking—the international advocacy organization, Human Rights Watch, documented the mistreatment and victimization of people with mental illness inside prisons. This elevated the issue to a policy level that culminated in federal legislation known as the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003. To better understand the issue of victimization inside prison as it relates to individuals with mental illness, the Center, as part of research funded by the Prison Rape Elimination Act, recently conducted a survey on the quality of prison life. This research was conducted in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Corrections. A random sample of adult inmates reported on the quality of medical and mental health treatment, vocational, educational, and legal services available to them; their treatment by officers and medical staff; sexual and physical victimization attempted or perpetrated by other inmates and staff, as well as the grievance procedures and physical environment. “The first duty of a prison… is to perform the function assigned to it by law… . It must, however, be clear that it is the imprisonment, and not the treatment in prison, that constitutes the punishment. Men come to prison as a punishment, not for punishment.” — Sir Alexander Paterson Approximately 7,500 randomly selected male and female inmates completed an hour-long survey using audio computer-assisted self-interview technology. A 40 percent random sample was drawn from each of 13 male adult institutions and a 60 percent sample from the only female institution involved in the survey. Mental Disorder inside Prison For reporting purposes, mental disorder was based on selfreported previous mental health treatment for particular mental disorders. More than one in five male inmates and one in two female inmates reported prior mental health treatment for a mental disorder. Prior treatment for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was reported by roughly one third of male and female inmates reporting prior mental health treatment. 1 Prevalence of Victimization Six-month prevalence rates of sexual victimization were higher for male and female inmates with a mental disorder, compared to inmates without a reported disorder (Table 1). For those reporting mental disorders, female inmates reported rates of sexual victimization that were nearly two to three times higher than rates estimated for their male counterparts. Physical victimization was more common than sexual victimization among both male and female inmates. Both males and females with mental disorder were disproportionately represented among victims of physical violence inside prison (Table 2). Six-month prevalence rates of physical victimization for males with any mental disorder were 1.6 times higher for victimization perpetrated by other inmates and 1.2 times higher if perpetrated by staff than that of males with no mental disorder. For female inmates, those with a mental disorder were 1.7 times more likely to report being physically victimized by another inmate than their counterparts with no mental disorder. 2 Authors Nancy Wolff, Ph.D., Director of the Center and Professor of Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick. (nwolff@ifh.rutgers.edu) Jing Shi, M.S., Statistician, Center for Behavioral Health Services & Criminal Justice Research. (jshi@ifh.rutgers.edu) Jane Siegel, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice, Rutgers UniversityCamden, and a Research Affiliate of the Center. (jasiegel@camden.rutgers.edu) About the Policy Brief The policy brief series is produced monthly and highlights a policy issue under study at the Center. Policy topics include reentry, diversion, sentencing, recidivism, employment, treatment, and recovery. For more information, see the News page on the Center’s website. The Center is a research unit in the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research. Center for Behavioral Health Services & Criminal Justice Research 176 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Tel: 732.932.1225 Fax: 732.932.1233 www.cbhs-cjr.rutgers.edu Survey Examines Victimization inside Prisons “. . . . ain’t nobody cares.” — New Jersey inmate Practice and Policy Implications People inside prison with mental disorders and prior histories of violent victimization are more likely to be victimized inside prison. Using these factors to classify people upon admission to prisons is critical for keeping them safe from predatory inmates. The increased vulnerability of people with mental illness inside correctional settings should be considered as a mediating factor in sentencing and as a justification for promoting diversion in lieu of incarceration for non-violent offenses. As a result of this study, the New Jersey Department of Corrections added curriculum on victimization to correctional officer training. It also introduced a zero tolerance policy on prison rape and an educational campaign among the inmate population focusing on prevention, reporting, and treatment of sexual victimization. Mental Illness as a Predictor of Victimization Prior treatment for depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or anxiety increased the likelihood of a male inmate being a victim of sexual assault and inappropriate sexual contact by another inmate, while having prior treatment for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder predicted inappropriate sexual contact but not sexual assault. The most significant predictor, however, was prior sexual victimization. Inmates, both male and female, who reported sexual victimization prior to age 18 were two to four times more likely to report being sexually victimized inside prison than inmates without such victimization histories.3 Depression, PTSD, and anxiety also elevated rates of physical assault and property theft, as well as the number of such incidents among male inmates—but not at the level found for sexual victimization. Physical victimization prior to age 18 also predicted physical victimization inside prison.4 Table 1. Six-month prevalence rates of sexual victimization, male and female inmates by mental disorder Rate of Sexual Victimizationa per 1,000 Inmates Male Sample (n=6,964) Perpetrator-type Female Sample (n=564) Any Mental Disorder (n=1,494) Seriousb Mental Disorder (n=447) No Mental Disorder (n=5,369) Any Mental Disorder (n=325) Serious Mental Disorder (n=120) No Mental Disorder (n=234) Inmate 83c 101 31 234 224 185 Staff 95 91 70 79 95 75 Inmate or Staff 151 163 89 272 285 209 a Defined as sexual assault or inappropriate touching that is sexually threatening. Defined as self-reported prior treatment for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. c Interpretation: For every 1000 inmates, 83 (or 8.3%) reported being sexually victimized by another inmate during a six-month period. b Table 2. Six-month prevalence rates of physical victimization, male and female inmates by mental disorder Rate of Physical Victimizationa per 1,000 Inmates Male Sample (n=7,221) Perpetrator-type a b 2 b Female Sample (n=564) Any Mental Disorder (n=1,609) Serious Mental Disorder (n=476) No Mental Disorder (n=5,507) Any Mental Disorder (n=325) Serious Mental Disorder (n=120) No Mental Disorder (n=234) Inmate 292 310 180 249 256 149 Staff 283 266 235 95 113 69 Inmate or Staff 428 428 324 289 303 173 Excludes property theft. Defined as self-reported prior treatment for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. September 2008 Survey Examines Victimization inside Prisons Next Step—Pilot Trial of Two Interventions for Trauma, Substance Use, and Mental Illness An abundance of evidence shows that the majority of women inside prison have mental health problems; have experienced physical, sexual, or emotional abuse during their formative years and often in adulthood; and have a substance use problem. Each of these experiences and behaviors increases the risks for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet only a minority of these women receives treatment for PTSD while incarcerated, even though these problems are risk factors for returning back to prison after release. This is compounded by the fact that women are entering and leaving prison in record numbers. The Center is funding a double-randomized pilot trial of two manualized interventions for female inmates with mental illness, substance use disorders, and trauma histories: “Seeking Safety” and “Trauma Recovery and Empowerment Model.” Both of theses interventions have evidence supporting their effectiveness but it is unclear which is most effective. The goal of this study is to identify which manualized intervention is most effective in a correctional setting (and for whom) and to identify whether these interventions when combined with reentry interventions improve clinical, behavioral, and social outcomes. Women will be randomized first to the trauma-integrated interventions. After completing one of the two trauma-integrated interventions, they will be randomized again to a skill-based reentry intervention or the usual reentry condition. Subjects will be followed into the community upon release and compared on mental health, substance use, independent living, and criminal justice outcomes. “During my many years in prison, I have personally witnessed hundreds of serious stabbings, beatings, inmates set on fire, and countless actual killings. My question to you [is] what makes the trauma of seeing ‘man’s inhumanity to man’ first hand here in prison any different than that experienced by soldiers?” — New Jersey inmate For more information regarding this project, email Dr. Nancy Wolff (team leader) at nwolff@ifh.rutgers.edu. Co-investigators: Joan Cook (Columbia Medical School), Christopher Frueh (Baylor College), Lisa Najavits (Boston University), Gregory McHugo (Dartmouth College), and Thomas TenHave (University of Pennsylvania). More Information on Victimization Inside Prison See our website www.cbhs-cjr.rutgers.edu to find more publications describing findings from our research on victimization inside prison. Future Policy Issue Briefs October 2008 Critical Time Intervention and Reentry by Jeffrey Draine and Beth Angell November 2008 Mental Illness, Arrest, and Best Practice Interventions by William Fisher and Bob Drake January 2009 Crisis Intervention Teams and Police Diversion by Amy Watson, Jeffrey Draine, Melissa Schaefer Morabito, and William Fisher Endnotes Wolff, N., Blitz, C.L., & Shi, J. (2007). Rates of sexual victimization in prison for inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1087-94. 1 2 Blitz, C.L., Wolff, N., & Shi, J. (2009). Physical victimization in prison: The role of mental illness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, in press. Wolff, N., Shi, J., Blitz, C.L., & Siegel, J. (2007). Understanding sexual victimization inside prisons: Factors that predict risk. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(3), 201-231. 3 4 Wolff, N., Shi, J., & Siegel, J. (2009). Understanding physical victimization inside prisons: Factors that predict risk. Justice Quarterly, in press. September 2008 3

