Skip navigation

Search

25 results
Brief • 2011
advanced by counsel for plaintiffs Vincent Peters (“Peters”) and Michael Whisenant (“Whisenant”)(Dkt. 54, 55, 56, 60 and 61). 1 Defendants--the City of Chicago and two of its Dkt. 73’s one-page response ...
Brief • 2011
and MICHAEL WHISENANT, Plaintiffs, No. 09 CV 4204 vs. CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER SEAN LEWIS, Star #5547, and CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER ROBERT RIVERA, Star #6396, Judge Milton I. Shadur Defendants ...
Case • 2003
the "indigent plaintiff presents exceptional circumstances." Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984). The record reflects that Goodman had the capacity to adequately present his claims pro se. His ...
Case • 2022
779, 780 (4th Cir. 1975). Exceptional circumstances depend on the type and complexity of the case and the ability of the plaintiff to present it. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984 ...
Article • March 1, 2025 • from PLN March, 2025
complexity and the plaintiff’s subjective abilities, whether the plaintiff ‘lacks the capacity to present it,’” quoting Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984). The Court noted ...
Brief • 2011
WHISENANT, Plaintiffs, No. 09 CV 4204 vs. CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER SEAN LEWIS, Star #5547, and CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER ROBERT RIVERA, Star #6396, Judge Milton I. Shadur Defendants ...
Article • August 15, 2024 • from PLN August, 2024
. Armistead, 582 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir. 1978). In Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984), the Court “adopted an objective test for Fourteenth Amendment claims of deliberate indifference.&rdquo ...
Case • 1993
also Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984); Branch v. Cole, 686 F.2d 264, 266 (5th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). [19] We asked "did the plaintiff appear to be competent to try it himself ...
Case • 1992
); Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984); Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1982); In Re Lane, 801 F.2d 1040 (8th Cir. 1986); Long v. Shillinger, 927 F.2d 525 (10th Cir. 1991); Holt v. Ford ...
Case • 1985
); Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 n.4 (4th Cir. 1984); see also Dewell v. Lawson, 489 F.2d 877, 882 (10th Cir. 1974). Accordingly, we find no error in the use of the Gamble standard by the trial court ...
Case • 1987
circumstances, Franklin, 745 F.2d at 1236, which are evaluated in light of the "characteristics of the claim and the litigant." Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984). McElyea makes several non ...
Case • 1986
if the legal issues presented are complex. 650 F.2d at 888-89. [31] The Maclin factors have been generally followed in other circuits. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984); Ulmer v ...
Brief • 2009
).................... 17 Dillard v. City of Greensboro, 213 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2000).................................................... 24 Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393 (1996) ........ 24 Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S ...
Case • 1988
by the due process clause is the same as that required by the eighth amendment for convicted prisoners. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 n.4 (4th Cir. 1984); see also Jones v. Johnson, 781 F.2d 769, 771 ...
Brief • September 4, 2009
, and27 that Mr. Sherrod should be limited to a rate of $150.00 per hour. In support of that assertion, defendant cites Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393 (11th Cir. 1996), in which the court awarded ...
Brief • October 13, 2012
by submitting affidavits of other attorneys in the relevant legal community. Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393, 1396-97 (11th Cir. 1996). Finally, the court may utilize its own personal experiences ...
Brief • 2009
represents a presumptively reasonable fee.” Military Circle Pet Ctr. v. Cobb County, 734 F.Supp. 502, 504 (N.D. Ga. 1990); Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393, 1396 (11th Cir. 1996). Moreover, “[t]he Supreme ...
Case • 1989
mandatory assignments); Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163, n. 3 (CA4 1984) (same). [52] *fn3 The sole reference to compulsory service in the short floor debate in the House supports this inference ...
Case • 1987
is the same as that allowed by the eighth amendment for convicted prisoners." Id. at 1574. Courts of appeals for the Fourth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits follow the same approach. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 ...
Brief • November 10, 2014
Filed under: Pepper Spray/Tear Gas
) ............................................................ 41, 42 Crenshaw v. Lister, 556 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2009) ................................................................ 37 Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393 (11th Cir. 1996 ...
Page 1 of 2. | 1 2 | Next »