Skip navigation

Search

18598 results
Page 103 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »

Brief • November 4, 2013
, and ALBERT PEREZ (“Defendant OFFICERS”): JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 to address the deprivation, under color of law, of the Plaintiff’s rights under ...
Brief • September 20, 2018
Filed under: Failure to Treat
in violation of the VIII and XIV Amendments of the United States Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff, William F. Sobczyk, is an individual who was incarcerated at Dixon ...
, Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Thomas S. Knight, by counsel listed below, brings this Complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 and the New Mexico Tort Claims Act against defendants Robert Metzgar and Joshua ...
Brief • March 12, 2024
Filed under: Excessive Force
Eldred Maliek Joe, by and through his undersigned counsel of record, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Morgan Eldridge Ridges, as well as a Tort Claims Act action ...
Publication
" through the highest level of the "available" administrative procedures prior to filing a suit under the ADA or any other Federal law. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2). There is considerable disagreement among ...
Brief • September 17, 2007
by the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and the laws of the State of Missouri. JURISDICTION STATEMENT 2. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1988 and the Fourth and Fourteenth ...
NISHIMOTO, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 16-cv-1974 BEN JMA THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Amendment 42 U.S.C ...
Brief • April 17, 2015
RIGHTS (42 USC§ 1983)- INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY UNDER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 25 26 27 28 COLA 02149 1 Plaintiffs, THE ESTATE OF JOHNNY MARTINEZ; ROBERTO MARTINEZ, individually, 2 and as Successor ...
Case • 2004
assistance." 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(b)(1) and(2). To assert a claim under RLUIPA, plaintiffs must produce "prima facie evidence to support a claim alleging a violation of the Free Exercise Clause . . . ." 42 ...
Brief • 2006
Kilzi v City of West Covina Ca Settlement Entry Excessive Force Taser 2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 PETER M. WILLIAMSON, State Bar No. 97309 TODD B. KRAUSS, State Bar No. 187991 WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS 18801 Ventura ...
Brief • 2007
procedural rule found at 735 ILCS 5/2-622 to plaintiff’s claim, that was alleged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1395dd, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. “Rule 2-622, as a state procedural rule ...
Case • 1991
Dotson v. Chester - 937 F.2d 920 (4th Cir. 1991) - 1991 Dotson v. Chester, 937 F.2d 920 (4th Cir. 06/05/1991) [1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT [2] Nos. 90 ...
that their rights are protected, including their rights under the Constitution and federal and state statutes. 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801(b)(1), 10801(b)(2)(A). 4 Case 3:21-cv-00146 Document 1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 5 of 60 ...
Case • 1994
, BRUNSWICK DIVISION [2] 293-87 [3] 880 F. Supp. 816, 1994 [4] December 20, 1994 [5] WILLIAM E. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK D. DEERING, MICHAEL J. BOWERS, LEE J. SWEAT, JR ...
Brief • 2009
of the United States Constitution, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Violation of Arizona State Constitution, art. 2, §§ 8 and 13; False Arrest/False Imprisonment; Assault; Battery; and Intentional Infliction of Emotional ...
Brief • 2007
injunctive relief under Case 2:07-cv-01729-ROS Document 1 -5Filed 09/10/2007 Page 5 of 13 1 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, she 2 signed into law ...
Brief • August 1, 2011
Filed under: First Amendment, Police
as commissioner ofthe Baltimore City Police Department, 601 East Fayette Street Baltimore, MD 21211-2908 Complaint Jury Trial Demanded Unknown Police Officers Nos. 1, 2 and 3, in both their personal capacities ...
Brief • December 11, 2013
. The Farmer v. Brennan Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2. Sgt. Valentine and CA Solomon Disregarded the Substantial Risk of Serious Harm to Mr. Castro When Locking Gonzalez ...
Case • 2007
of a State or States or local government'" (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1)(B))). To state a claim under Title II, the plaintiff must allege that (1) he is a qualified individual with a disability, (2) who ...
Brief • October 13, 2022
Filed under: COVID-19
(42 U.S.C. 247d), the State is immune from claims arising out of administration of the covid-19 vaccine. THIS CLAIM IS DENIED SOLICITOR GENERAL OR DESIGNEE ACTION BY THE OFFICE OF THE IOWA ATTORNEY ...
Page 103 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »