Skip navigation

Search

18598 results
Page 136 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »

06 / Jan 07 The Tennessee Department of Correction (“TDOC”) claims that its goal is the rehabilitation of the offender.2 It is true, arguably, that rehabilitation is the goal most consistent ...
Brief • 2009
Standard for Claims Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983……………………………………………………………………………19 D. Section 1983 Claims Against the Individual Defendants……………………….22 1. Jail Officer Teipen ………………………………………………………23 2. Jail ...
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK .: : n~ 1, rl C r :"' ·~ I _u '- 2 ~~--~~~~~1~-J-;?2--~:.--[Q:--5-s------------------------------------X , ..<, \U' ,) ;) ABNER LOUIMA and MICHELINE LOUIMA, ,, L'.S : ' j ...
Brief • January 15, 2016
Carter v. San Juan County, NM, Amended Complaint, medical neglect wrongful death respiratory, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-00417-JB-LF Document 177-1 Filed 01/15/16 Page 2 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ...
42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(2). The court of appeals affirmed. The court rejected White's argument that the Michigan DOC's grievance procedure is inadequate. Because the case was dismissed without prejudice ...
Article • November 15, 2007 • from PLN November, 2007
Litigation Reform Act (42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2)) does not apply where the plaintiff, as here, is a publisher and not a prisoner.) It was further agreed that interest at 4.96 % ($43/day) would accrue, per 28 ...
Article • May 15, 2007
argued that the Act violated the Fourth Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause and the Ex Post Facto Clause. The U.S. District Court determined that 42 U.S.C. §1435a(a)(2) was unconstitutional in Miles ...
and the Department of Social Services, brought suit against city officials acting in their official capacity under 42 § 1983, challenging a policy of requiring pregnant employees to take maternity leave before ...
regarding whether he exhausted his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). Clarence Evans, a New York state prisoner, brought action pursuant to 42 U.S.C ...
is a result of an investigation initiated in 2004 by the DOJ pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 USC §1997 (CRIPA) and the Violent Crime Control and Enforcement Act of 1994, 42 USC ...
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2) Punitive damages may be considered by a jury in a § 1983 suit if a prisoner's constitutionally protected rights are recklessly or callously disregarded due to a guards ...
to have a DCS official receive and manage the plaintiffs' benefits. All of the plaintiffs' benefit money was used to reimburse the state for the cost of plaintiffs' "maintenance." Plaintiff's, brought 42 ...
Article • May 15, 2007
. Bryan E. Ransom, a California state prisoner, sued prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for various constitutional rights violations (unspecified in the opinion). Prior to dismissal, Ransom moved ...
, the Court reversed the trial court order compelling discovery and remanded the case for further proceedings. See: County of Los Angeles v. Gavira, 139 Cal.App.4th 8, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 390 (Cal.App. 2 Dist., 2006). ...
Case • 2000
Trammell v. Davis - 208 F.3d 218 (8th Cir. 2000) - 2000 [U] Mittendorf v. Braun, 208 F.3d 218 (8th Cir. 03/27/2000) [1] U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit [2] No. 99-3979 [3 ...
Article • August 22, 2016
filed a 42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983 Civil Rights case against the DOCS alleging mistreatment while he was in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) at Wende Correctional Facility (Wende). He had initially filed ...
with court orders and other legal obligations concerning prisoner-Decedent’s serious medical needs,... pursuant to 42 USC §§ 1983 and 1988, the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments ...
Publication
Ada Rehabilitation Act and Section 1983 Chart 2008 Constitutional Litigation October 9, 2008 ADA, Rehabilitation Act and Section 1983 Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12131) Entity ...
Publication
Filed under: International, Immigration
under 42 CFR 2.31(d) and is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a first offense or a fine of not more than $5000 for a subsequent offense with 42 CFR 2.14. Purpose or need for the disclosure ...
, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communications, and working.” 42 U.S.C. § 12102(1)(A) and (2)(A). 6. Plaintiffs also suggested in their motion and the parties now suggest in their post-settlement ...
Page 136 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »