Skip navigation

Search

18598 results
Page 159 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »

Brief • 2006
of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2. The Court has federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 3. Venue is appropriate ...
Brief
, individually, and ) FLOYD SIMONS, individually, ) ) Defendants. ) No. JURY TRIAL REQUESTED COMPLAINT I. 1. Preliminary Statement This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§1983 and 2000d for damages ...
Brief • 2012
her attorneys, files this complaint against the defendants for violations of 42 U.S.C. §1983, and the common law, by way of Supplemental Jurisdiction, of her constitutional rights under the Fourth ...
Brief • October 28, 2011
assaulted him . their superviso rs, and the City of New York. JURISDICTION 2. The action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and under the Fourteenth Amendment and/or Eighth Amendment ...
Clause of the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom 2 CC_000387 Provision of the New Mexico Constitution. Defendants further violated the First Amendment by retaliating against Ms. Lujan ...
Brief • June 30, 2022
is a local public body as defined in NMSA 1978, -2- Exhibit A Case 1:22-cv-00484-LF-SCY Document 1-1 Filed 06/30/22 Page 3 of 161 § 41-4-3 and a person for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Santa Fe County ...
Case • 2002
, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Specifically, defendants contend that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiff's claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ...
Brief
VAP (SGLx) [PROPOSED] FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. LOSS OF FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIP th 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (14 Amend.) 2. SURVIVAL ACTIONth 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (8 Amendment) 3. 4. 5. SURVIVAL ACTION ...
Case • 1987
Valiant-Bey v. Morris - 829 F.2d 1441 (8th Cir. 1987) - 1987 Valiant-Bey v. Morris, 829 F.2d 1441 (8th Cir. 09/29/1987) [1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT [2 ...
Brief • September 9, 2008
Filed under: Exercise, Visiting
and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 42) (Doc. 44), filed on September 9, 2008. Case 6:07-cv-00609-BB-LAM Document 45 Filed 09/09/08 Page 2 of 6 Standard of Review Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party may ...
Brief • September 8, 2014
Filed under: Telephones
Commission determines whether the charges and practices that Plaintiffs challenge violated the Federal Communications Act, 42 U.S.C. § 201; 2.) Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their Federal Communications Act ...
Kickback publication • September 10, 2014
the charges and practices that Plaintiffs challenge violated the Federal Communications Act, 42 U.S.C. § 201; 2.) Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their Federal Communications Act cause of action; 3.) The court ...
OF LOS ANGELES; 23 (5) DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RlGHTS, 42 U.S.C. § 1983AMONELL VIOLATIONS, COUNTY uF LOS ANGELES 24 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. 22 25 26 27 28 1 COLA 03169 se 2:18-cv-05775-KS Document 1 ...
Case • 2009
and Notification Act (SORNA) became effective with respect to a defendant who had been convicted of a sexual offense [***2] before passage of SORNA. The Government indicted defendant Cain under 18 U.S.C. § 2250 ...
Case • 1999
‚§ 1997e(d)(2) limiting an attorney fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to 150% of the judgment awarded in prisoner cases is not rationally related to any legitimate governmental interest, I conclude ...
Brief • August 20, 2020
Filed under: Failure to Treat
causes of harm to Plaintiff Glass. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Eighth Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment- Excessive Force 11 Case 2:20-cv-11031-DML-CI ECF No. 17, PageID.147 Filed 08 ...
Brief • November 28, 2005
watch in the Health Services Center or in SPU in accordance with the directive of the Assistant Commissioner dated September 13, 2004 (Exhibit 42). 2) In accordance with paragraph 12 of the 2001 ...
Brief • December 19, 2012
Filed under: Good Time, Overdetention
Phone: 515.259.1110 Email: Thomas@glazebrookmoe.info CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FRAP RULE 26.1) None is required in this case. 2 SUMMARY OF THE CASE PURSUANT TO Local Rule 28A(i)(1). Named ...
Brief • July 1, 2005
mentally ill, mentally retarded, and/or physically disabled. They are unable to pay the fines 2 imposed upon them. Over three decades ago, the United States Supreme Court held that criminal defendants may ...
N.S. v. Wood, NV, Amended Complaint, Excessive Force Delirium, 2017 Case 3:17-cv-00133-MMD-WGC Document 4 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 26 1 2 3 4 TERRI KEYSER-COOPER Law Office of Terri Keyser-Cooper ...
Page 159 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »