Skip navigation

Search

39120 results
Page 1607 of 1956. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 ... 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 | Next »

Brief • August 24, 2006
COMPLAINT Plaintiffs L.J. McCoy and Antonio Thompson show the Court as follows: STATEMENT OF CLAIM 1. L.J. McCoy, as grandmother, and Antonio V. Thompson, brother and sole heir of Mr. Burrell, bring ...
Brief • February 5, 2014
., OFFICER PATRICK COE, OFFICER MICHAEL VALUCH,Jr., OFFICER ROLANDO HERNANDEZ and unknown Milwaukee Police Department employees and officers, (“Defendant Officers”), states as follows: Introduction 1 ...
* * v. * * Hillsborough County Department * of Corrections * * Defendants * ************************** Doris Sanabria Civil Action: 1:07-cv-284-JM COMPLAINT PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. The Plaintiff ...
Juszczyk v. Sansen, CA, Settlement, Unlawful Arrest, 2014 SETfLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreem.ent'1 is made by and between KEVIN JUSZCZVK ...
Brief • December 3, 2012
will treat Mr. Rogers as though there were no break in his employment; Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release in Full Zhon Rogers and the City of Albuquerque Page 1 of 5 d The City will pay to or on Mr ...
, the PARTIES hereby agree as follows: 1. STEVEN DASOVICH, in consideration for payment of the sum of Thirty- Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($37,500.00), (a) authorizes his coW1sel ...
as follows: 1. Release and Discharge. For the good and valuable consideration of the specific payment set forth in Paragraph 5, Plaintiff, for himself and each of his agents, predecessors, successors, heirs ...
TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute a Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice of her Complaint in its entirety as to named Defendant. Counsel representing Plaintiff ...
Brief • September 1, 2018
forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute a Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice of her complaint in its entirety ...
that Defendants and County had, has or may have against Plaintiff. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute a Stipulation for Dismissal ...
Brief • March 5, 2021
the County on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute a Request for Dismissal with prejudice ...
known and unknown claims that he has or may have against the County on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Payment to Cevallo Upon ...
8CV333705 and all other known and unknown claims that he has or may have against the County on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 ...
known and unknown claims that Plaintiff has or may have against the County on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action ...
Brief • April 11, 2018
Plaintiff a check payable to Albert G. Stoll, Jr., A Law Corporation, in the amount of $1 million (one million dollars). The County will not file the executed Stipulation for Dismissal until the settlement ...
on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute a Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice of his ...
, employee, agent, contractor, or representative on the terms and conditions set forth below. ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Dismissal of Action Plaintiff will execute ...
or former. employees of the County or the Sheriff ("Clai1:ns");and lT 1S 1-ffiREBYAGREED, by and among the Parties, as follows: l. Consideration. Jn consideration for the full and complete settlement ...
, in the Lawsuit, as more fully stated below. 1 _____ CB AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IN EXCHANGE FOR THE MUTUAL PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN, AND FOR OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the parties collectively agree ...
Brief • April 27, 2020
Barnett v. Goldsmith, WI, Complaint, Retaliation-Beating, 2020 Case: 3:20-cv-00298-slc Document #: 8 Filed: 04/27/20 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT ...
Page 1607 of 1956. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 ... 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 | Next »