Skip navigation

Search

133 results
Page 2 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »

Premature Appeal Not Frivolous Under PLRA by The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has held the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s (PLRA’s) “three strikes” provision does not encompass a dismissal for filing a premature notice of appeal. New York prisoner Injah E. Tafari brought a civil rights action in September 2000, …
Sixth Circuit Vacates Section 1915(e)(2) Dismissal of Discrimination Claim by The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a lower court’s sua sponte dismissal of a Kentucky prisoner’s race discrimination claim as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Kentucky prisoner DeWayne Brand, an African-American, shared a cell with white prisoner Troy …
Article • August 15, 2013 • from PLN August, 2013
Seventh Circuit Asks Illinois Supreme Court to Interpret "Frivolous" Litigation Statute by Seventh Circuit Asks Illinois Supreme Court to Interpret "Frivolous" Litigation Statute In an August 29, 2012 decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals asked the Illinois Supreme Court to interpret a state law that authorizes the revocation of …
Article • April 15, 2013 • from PLN April, 2013
Seventh Circuit: Cost Bond Improper Tool to Address Prisoner’s Frivolous Filings by On May 30, 2012, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Illinois federal district court’s order that imposed a cost bond on an indigent prisoner which the court knew he could not afford, holding that such an …
Article • April 15, 2013
Fourth District Court of Appeals Reverses PLRA Case on Removal of Jurisdiction by The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth District remanded in May 2012 to the state court a cause tested against issues of subject matter jurisdiction and improper removal to a higher court. The case was …
Article • March 15, 2013
South Carolina Prisoner's Case Dismissed Under Three Strikes Rule of PLRA by Derek Gilna Prisoner James G. Blakely, according to the decision, “has pursued over forty cases in federal district court, ten appeals in this Court, and numerous suits in state court.” The case before the Fourth Circuit Court of …
Article • February 15, 2013 • from PLN February, 2013
Seventh Circuit Approves Illinois Prison’s Rejection of PDR and Drug Guide by On March 9, 2012, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner’s civil rights action that alleged violation of his constitutional rights due to the censorship of two books by prison officials. James Munson, …
No “Strike” Under PLRA When Some Claims are Heard on the Merits by Brandon Sample A prisoner does not incur a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) unless his or her suit is dismissed entirely as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim, the U.S. Court …
Article • May 15, 2012
Second Circuit Dismisses New York Prisoner's § 1983 Action for Deliberate Indifference to Diabetic Diet by Second Circuit Dismisses New York Prisoner's § 1983 Action for Deliberate Indifference to Diabetic Diet The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed a § 1983 claim by prisoner Steve Collazo, who had alleged …
Article • February 15, 2012
Ninth Circuit: Prevailing Civil Rights Defendant Entitled to Recover Attorney Fees Only with Respect to Work Attributable Exclusively to Frivolous Claims by A divided Ninth Circuit panel has held that, in a civil rights action with multiple claims, only some of which are groundless, a prevailing defendant is entitled to …
Article • November 15, 2011
Tenth Circuit Bars Prisoner From Filing Claim In Forma Pauperis by The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Michael Lee Strope, also known as Gordon Eugene Strope, a prisoner in the state of Kansas, is barred from filing any further civil action informal pauperis (IFN). Before the court were …
Article • September 15, 2011
Eighth Circuit Rules Previous Dismissals Not “Strikes” For Iowa Prisoner by On December 29, 2006, the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the dismissal of a prisoner’s previous federal lawsuits could not be counted as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because the prisoner had not yet exhausted …
Indiana Supreme Court Strikes Down Prisoner Frivolous Litigator Law by By John E. Dannenberg The Indiana Supreme Court held that Indiana's 2004 "Three Strikes Law," which forever barred a prisoner from filing another lawsuit if he had earlier had three prior suits dismissed as frivolous, violated the Open Courts Clause …
Article • July 15, 2011
“Three Strikes” Provision Of PLRA Applies To Suits Filed While Incarcerated Even If Subsequently Released by Brandon Sample By Brandon Sample The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which prohibits a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) in a federal lawsuit if the prisoner has had three or more suits …
Second Circuit Explains §1915 Strikes and Imminent Danger by Mark Wilson Second Circuit Explains §1915 Strikes and Imminent Danger By Mark Wilson The Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that a lower court abused its discretion in denying a pro se prisoner leave to amend his complaint to allege an …
Eleventh Circuit Finds Disabled Prisoner in Imminent Danger for Filing Fee Purposes by David Reutter by David M. Reutter The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated a Georgia federal district court’s injunction that prohibited a prisoner from submitting future filings, and reversed the lower court’s dismissal of the prisoner’s …
Article • January 15, 2010
Seventh Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Medical Care Claims by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has reversed the dismissal of a prisoner’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming deliberately indifferent medical care. Vantice Beshears alleged that while incarcerated at the Champaign County Jail, medical staff prescribed and …
Human Rights Watch Report Calls to Reform PLRA by David Reutter by David M. Reutter “The PLRA has had a devastating effect on the ability of incarcerated persons to protect their health and safety and vindicate other fundmanetal rights,” concludes a June 2009 report titled No Equal Justice: The Prison …
Article • October 15, 2009
PLRA’s Frivolous Litigator IFP Cap Trumped by “Imminent Danger” Claim by The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has held that a prisoner who alleged as one of his claims in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint that he was in “imminent danger of serious physical injury,” but who qualified …
Article • October 15, 2009
PLRA Three Strikes Applicable to Halfway House “Prisoner” by In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has decided that detention in a halfway house, as a condition of mandatory supervision stemming from a criminal conviction, satisfies the definition of “prisoner” under the …
Page 2 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »