Skip navigation

Search

74 results
Page 4 of 4. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 |

Article • April 15, 2011
First Circuit Enters Stay to District Court Proceedings Following Interlocutory Appeal by On August 4, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit stayed district court proceedings in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit following an interlocutory appeal by three Boston police officers who were sued in their …
Brief • January 23, 2011
Glik v Cunniffe, MA, Amicus Brief, 1st Am false arrest publicly videotaping police, 2011 Case: 10-1764 Document: 00116161442 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/23/2011 Entry ID: 5520809 10-1764 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit SIMON GLIK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN CUNNIFFE, in his individual capacity; PETER J. …
Brief • January 18, 2011
Glik v Cunniffe, MA, Plf Brief, 1st Am false arrest publicly videotaping police, 2011 Case: 10-1764 Document: 00116159256 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2011 Entry ID: 5519386 No. 10-1764 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _________________________________ SIMON GLIK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN CUNNIFFE, in his individual capacity; PETER SAVALIS, …
Article • February 15, 2009 • from PLN February, 2009
Kitsap County, Washington Jail Settles Public Records Act Suit for $125,000 by Kitsap County, Washington Jail Settles Public Records Act Suit for $125,000 On May 16, 2008, the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office agreed to pay $125,000 to a former prisoner for violations of Washington’s Public Records Act. In September 2006, …
Important Application of Qualified Immunity to Supervisory Liability Claims by This is probably the most important opinion the Second Circuit has issued concerning the application of qualified immunity to supervisory liability. Although it is not a prison case, it has significant implications for a largely unrecognized question in prison litigation. …
Article • May 15, 2007
District of Columbia is "Suable Entity" Under 42 U.S.C. §1983 by District of Columbia is "Suable Entity" Under 42 U.S.C. §1983 The United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C.) held that the district can be sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Twenty-three D.C. prisoners at the Lorton Reformatory …
Article • May 15, 2007
Intercepted Conversation of Jail Visitor Not Protected by The United States Supreme Court held that a state court conviction, for refusing to answer questions interposed by a state legislative committee, did not present a federal due process question, under the circumstances of the case. Although the Court declined to explicitly …
Article • May 15, 2007
Not Allowing Prisoner to View Disciplinary Video Upheld by The petitioner was disciplined for stealing a mattress, as supposedly revealed by a videotape; he was not permitted to see the videotape because prison officials "did not want the offenders to know the capabilities of the cameras for security reasons." The …
Article • May 15, 2007
No Media Filming of Missouri Execution Allowed by Two Reverends and the New Life Evangelistic Center challenged the prison system's ban on cameras and tape recorders at executions. The case is not mooted by the completion of the execution the plaintiffs wanted to videotape. The case falls squarely within the …
Article • May 15, 2007
Filed under: Searches, Videotaping
Intercepted Conversation of Jail Visitor Not Protected by The United States Supreme Court held that a state court conviction, for refusing to answer questions interposed by a state legislative committee, did not present a federal due process question, under the circumstances of the case. Although the Court declined to explicitly …
Article • May 15, 2007
No Brady Violation in Prison Disciplinary Hearing; Videotape Inconclusive by The U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, denied habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner challenging a disciplinary hearing that revoked his good-time credits, where the prisoner alleged that prison officials …
Article • May 15, 2007
Videotaping States Claim, District of Columbia Can be Sued Under §1983 by Videotaping States Claim, District of Columbia Can be Sued Under §1983 The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that the District of Columbia could be sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and that prisoners' allegations of …
Article • May 15, 2007
Videotape Evidence Properly Admitted in Prisoner's Beating Trial by The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania, held that the district court did not err in admitting a videotape of the location where an attack took place, and that even if admitting …
Publication • November 12, 2002
Letter re Prison Video, NY Committee on Open Government, 2002 Welcome to the Committee on Open Government Services 1/23/2015 News Government State of New York Department of State Committee on Open Government O ne Com m erce Plaza 99 W ashington Ave. Albany, New York 12231 (518) 474-2518 Fax (518) …
Page 4 of 4. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 |