Skip navigation

Search

1219 results
Page 59 of 61. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 | Next »

PLRA Applied to Attorney Fees by A federal district court in Michigan held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) required that attorneys representing prisoners be paid a maximum of $112.50 an hour. Hadix v. Johnson is the long running Michigan class action suit. After prevailing in the district court …
Article • March 15, 1997 • from PLN March, 1997
PLRA 'Strike' Removed by A federal district court in Maryland issued an order removing a PLRA "strike" against a prisoner litigant. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) added section (g) to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The new section states that whenever a prisoner has had three suits dismissed as frivolous …
Article • March 15, 1997 • from PLN March, 1997
PLRA Overrules FRAP 24(a) by The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that the PLRA's filing fee provisions supersede Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) 24(a). Ira Jackson, a Texas state prisoner filed suit claiming prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The district court …
Article • March 15, 1997 • from PLN March, 1997
Third Circuit: PLRA Doesn't Apply to Mandamus by The court of appeals for the third circuit held that the filing fee provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) do not apply to writs of mandamus. Ronald Madden, a Tennessee state prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his extradition …
Article • March 15, 1997 • from PLN March, 1997
5th Circuit: PLRA Doesn't Apply to Habeas by Joining the second, third and seventh circuits the court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA do not apply to habeas corpus actions. Ralph Cole, a federal prisoner, sought permission to appeal the denial …
Article • March 15, 1997 • from PLN March, 1997
Pro Se Tips and Tactics (Injunctive Relief) by John Midgley In many cases in which a prisoner or group of prisoners is suing over bad prison conditions or practices, the prisoners want an injunction, that is, an order to require state officials to stop violating constitutional rights. This column briefly …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN January, 1997
NY Jail Consent Decrees Vacated under PLRA by A federal district court in New York upheld the constitutionality of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and terminated a series of consent decrees in seven cases that governed conditions at Rikers Island and several other New York City jails. Readers should …
Beating Damages Affirmed; PLRA Not Retroactive on Vacated Attorney Fees by The court of appeals for the seventh circuit affirmed a jury verdict awarding damages to two prisoners who were beaten by prison guards and then denied medical care for their injuries for nearly two days. The court held that …
South Carolina Consent Decree Terminated under PLRA by The court of appeals for the fourth circuit upheld the termination of a consent decree pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and rejected challenges to the constitutionality of the PLRA. In 1982 South Carolina prisoners filed suit challenging conditions of …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN January, 1997
PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Released Prisoners by The court of appeals for the second circuit held that the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) requiring payment of filing fees do not apply if the prisoner is released after filing suit. Clarence McGann, a New York state prisoner, …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN February, 1997
Third Circuit Rules that PLRA Doesn't Apply to Habeas by The court of appeals for the third circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) provision that prisoner litigants pay the filing fee for civil actions does not apply to habeas corpus petitions. The court gave an extensive discussion …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN February, 1997
PLRA's IFP Provisions Violate Equal Protection by A federal district court in Iowa held that the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) are retroactive and violate the equal protection clause of the fifth amendment. Section 804(d) of the PLRA created a new subsection to …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN February, 1997
PLRA IFP Provision Applied Retroactively by The court of appeals for the ninth circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), which allows courts to dismiss prisoner suits that have been filed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) at any time if determined to be frivolous, can be applied retroactively to appeals pending …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN January, 1997
Seventh Circuit Applies PLRA to Federal Prisoners by In five consolidated appeals the court of appeals for the seventh circuit applied the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) to actions brought by federal prisoners. The court held that this ruling, together with Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853 (7th Cir. …
Article • February 15, 1997 • from PLN January, 1997
Seventh Circuit Defines and Applies PLRA and AEDPA by In five consolidated appeals the seventh circuit held that for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) neither habeas corpus petitions nor petitions for mandamus in criminal proceedings constitute "prisoner litigation" and thus do not require payment of filing fees …
PLRA Not Retroactive on Attorney Fees by The court of appeals for the eighth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provisions limiting attorney fees in prison cases is not to be retroactively applied. The court also affirmed the district court ruling that the practice of randomly double …
Article • December 15, 1996 • from PLN December, 1996
PLRA Not Applicable to Appeals Filed before Passage by The court of appeals for the second circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) fee provisions did not apply to appeals submitted prior to its passage. The court also held that summary judgment rulings must be properly supported by …
Article • December 15, 1996 • from PLN December, 1996
PLRA Stay Provision Held Unconstitutional by In two separate rulings different judges in Michigan held that the stay provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3626(e) are unconstitutional. Among the PLRA's provisions to section 3626(e) which provides that "Prospective relief subject to a pending …
Article • December 15, 1996 • from PLN December, 1996
Attorney Fees Awarded in Smoking Suit by A federal district court in Nebraska awarded a prisoner plaintiff $8,346 in attorney fees and $2,952 in expenses in a suit challenging Nebraska state prisoners' exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS, also known an second hand smoke). This to the first published case …
Article • November 15, 1996 • from PLN November, 1996
Filing Fee Requirement Not Retroactive by The court of appeals for the tenth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) did not have retroactive effect as applied to filing fees for indigent litigants. David White, a Colorado state prisoner, filed suit after he was denied access to a …
Page 59 of 61. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 | Next »