Skip navigation

Search

283 results
Page 6 of 15. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next »

Article • April 15, 2009
Court Orders California Prison Officials to produce Document In Response To Discovery Request by U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Hollows has ordered prison officials in a suit alleging inadequate medical care to turn over various documents not provided in response to requests for discovery. Victor Carrasquillo, a California state prisoner, filed …
California Juvenile Parolees Entitled to Two-Step Revocation Process; Case Settles by John Dannenberg California Juvenile Parolees Entitled to Two-Step Revocation Process; Case Settles by John E. Dannenberg The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California has held that the rights of California juvenile parolees were violated by the …
District of Columbia Rehabilitation Program Contractor Liable in Juvenile’s Death; $1,000,000 Verdict Upheld by Bob Williams District of Columbia Rehabilitation Program Contractor Liable in Juvenile’s Death; $1,000,000 Verdict Upheld by Bob Williams Re-Direct, Inc., a company that provides services for juveniles for the District of Columbia, appealed the denial of …
Article • February 15, 2009
Three-Judge Federal Court Compels California DOC to Produce Documents by The three-judge federal panel that was convened to consider reducing California’s prison population, so as to remedy constitutionally inadequate medical care and mental health care, has granted a motion to compel filed by the prisoner-plaintiffs. The court compelled the California …
DC Circuit Rejects Waiver of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (DC) held that a patient’s communications with his therapist were privileged and not subject to discovery. The Court found that there had been no implied or express waiver of the psychotherapist-patient privilege. …
Article • January 15, 2009
L.A. Documents Ordered Produced Regarding False Arrest And Prosecution by California State resident Raul Ramirez sought production of documents pertaining to his unlawful arrest and prosecution of a crime he was subsequently acquitted. The documents were for use in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and were ordered produced with …
California Ex Deputy Sheriff's Incriminating Statements Not Protected Under POBRA by Ventura County (California) and it's sheriff's department (County) appealed an injunction preventing their use of statements made by ex deputy Michael Van Winkle who was under investigation for criminal activity. Van Winkle asserted that his statements were protected under …
California Police Officer's Disciplinary Records Ordered Produced In Excessive Force Case by The San Diego (California) Police Department (SDPD) sought review of an appellate court order to produce derivative information, discovered in an earlier case, regarding a police officer accused of using excessive force. The order was affirmed. Tariq Chambers …
Houston District Attorney Caught in E-mail Scandal, Resigns, Held in Contempt by Gary Hunter Houston District Attorney Caught in E-mail Scandal, Resigns, Held in Contempt by Gary Hunter Racist jokes, sexually explicit photos, love notes to his mistress and evidence of improper political campaigning were found in the e-mail account …
Article • August 15, 2008
West Virginia Police Internal Affairs Investigation Reports are Conditionally Discoverable in Civil Actions by Donald McClay, a West Virginia state prisoner, was assaulted by an unidentified state trooper while under arrest for illegally registering to vote. He filed a complaint which was investigated by the state police Internal Affairs. McClay …
Article • August 15, 2008
Delaware Public Defender Has No Standing Under State FOIA by The Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle, has held that the office of the Public Defender does not have standing to make requests under the Delaware Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The Public Defender submitted a FOIA request to the …
Court Orders Discovery of D.C. Cop’s Personnel Files by At 355: "... [A]ny claim that a party's potential witnesses and exhibits are not fit subjects for discovery is fatuous." The existence of a pre-trial order procedure does not retroactively make those subjects unfit for discovery. The court directs production of …
Article • August 15, 2008
Alaska Cops' Personnel Files not Confidential by James Jennings, a former Alaska state prisoner, sued police in state court under state law and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 for damages, claiming excessive force, false imprisonment and unconstitutional application of force. The trial court ordered the city of Anchorage to …
Article • August 15, 2008
California Cops' Internal Affairs Investigation Records Exempt from Disclosure under State PRA by The Press-Enterprise (newspaper) sued the city of Hemet, California in state court under the state Public Records Act (PRA), Cal. Gov't Code § 6250 et seq to compel disclosure of records pertaining to a police internal affairs …
California Prison Gang Information Ruled Confidential by Arturo Losoya and Robert Aguirre, California state prisoners, sought discovery in their state court criminal trials of investigatory security files on gang activity. The trial court ordered prison officials to produce the information, and the Department of Corrections (DOC) appealed. On appeal: the …
Article • August 15, 2008
No Extension for Late Discovery Requests, Case Dismissed by The defendants moved for summary judgment in a two-year-old case; the plaintiff asked that the motion be deferred for additional discovery, since he had just recently (four months previously) identified the offending police officer and was prepared to file discovery requests …
Article • August 15, 2008
Filed under: Court Access, Discovery
Court Access Rights Discussed by At 785: "The right of access to the courts arises in a variety of contexts." The right to sue and defend in court is a privilege of citizenship guaranteed by the Constitution. There is a right of court access encompassed within the right to petition …
Article • August 15, 2008
Deposition Objections Discussed by The 1993 amendments to Rule 30, Fed.R.Civ.P., which require objections in depositions to be stated "concisely and in a non-argumentative and non-suggestive manner," were a response in part to speaking and coaching objections like "if you know" and "if you remember." The court condemns plaintiff's attorneys' …
Article • August 15, 2008
Challenge to Missouri Lethal Injection Protocol Remanded for Discovery by On April 27, 2006, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded a death row prisoner's challenge to Missouri’s lethal injection protocol for additional discovery following a botched attempt at resolving the issue using an accelerated schedule. Michael Anthony Taylor, a …
Article • August 15, 2008
County Prosecutor, Juvenile Court Manager's E-mails Ordered Disclosed Regarding Court's Dissolution by The Cowles Publishing Company (CPC) appealed an Idaho state district court’s ruling for non-disclosure of a settlement agreement regarding the dissolution of the Kootenai County Juvenile Education Training Court (JETC). Former JETC manager Marina Kalani appealed the same …
Page 6 of 15. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next »