Skip navigation

Search

20007 results
Page 675 of 1001. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 ... 997 998 999 1000 1001 | Next »

Case • 2005
to which is required by s. 120.54(3)(a)1." § § 120.52(8)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2004). n4 The Legislature has provided the following standards to be used when determining whether a particular rule constitutes ...
Case • 2001
for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 96 C 7249--Paul E. Plunkett, Judge. [7] Before Easterbrook, Ripple, and Evans, Circuit Judges. [8] The opinion of the court was delivered ...
Case • 1997
are in substantial compliance with the minimum acceptable standards promulgated under subsection (b)." Section(s) 1997e(a)(2). Before exhaustion may be required, the court must further conclude that it "would ...
Case • 1995
must be assumed [**8] to be true for the purposes of this motion, are sufficient to state a claim for relief against both Sergeant Ingram and the District of Columbia. B. Municipal Liability Defendants ...
Case • 1989
enacted the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Pub.L. No. 100-259, 102 Stat. 28 (codified at 29 U.S.C. Section 794(b)(1)(A) (Supp. 1989)). The Restoration Act amended Section 504 of the Rehabilitation ...
Case • 2004
, District Judge, Presiding. DISPOSITION: Affirmed. COUNSEL: Robin B. Hammond, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, Montana, for the defendant-appellant. Klaus P. Richter, Office of the United ...
Case • 2004
will be scheduled by the classification manager for review when the offender has not less than 90 days remaining on their sentence. b. Cases not meeting the MDT referral criteria may be considered for referral ...
Case • 2003
CONSULTANTS, INC., d/b/a DMC GROUP and NAKED JEANS; DELROY ALLEN; ABC COMPANIES; and JOHN DOES, Defendants. 03 Civ. 5536 (NRB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 289 ...
Case • 2003
OF THE COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, AND DOES 1-4, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. [6] Arapahoe County District Court No. 01CV0647 Honorable Thomas C. Levi, Judge [7] Mark John Peterson, Pro Se ...
Case • 2003
pursuant to an official policy or custom. [78] C. Whether the district court erred in finding no violation of Alkire's due process and equal protection rights when defendants failed to allow credit ...
Case • 2008
in violation of the laws of the United States of America and the State of South Dakota. [*6] Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under SDCL 15-6-12(b ...
Case • 2004
Prator v. Caddo Parish - 888 So.2d 812 (La. 2004) - 2004 STEVE PRATOR, SHERIFF OF CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA versus CADDO PARISH 04-C-0794 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA 04-0794 (La. 12/01/04 ...
: 2005cv60 Div: B Counterclaimant: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA Counterclaim Defendants: RICHARD ALLISON, et. al. Attorneys for Plaintiff: William A. Trine, #577 Trine & Metcalf, P.C. 2919 Valmont ...
Brief • March 6, 2012
on or about July 14, 2004; and (b) the subsequent police investigation into Plaintiff, including the filing of criminal charges, arrest, pretrial detention, and criminal prosecution of Plaintiff. Fifty percent ...
will it is sufficient that defendant treated plaintiffs unfavorably because of their handicap." See: Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis, 843 F.Supp. 1556, 1577 (E.D. Mo. 1994). Intentional discrimination can ...
Brief • 2013
-security prison. Def.’s Mot., Ex. B. In response, the Warden explained that she understood Plaintiff McGowan’s complaint to be that his placement in the CMU “violates [his] constitutional rights and [that he ...
Brief • 2005
he would reside when released to probation. Paragraph 15(b) of the sex offender probation order entered by this court reads as follows: The victim being under eighteen (18) years of age, you ...
Brief • 2007
BELBACHIR, Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF McHENRY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 06 C 1392 Judge Philip G. Reinhard Magistrate Judge P. Michael Mahoney AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S 56(F ...
Brief
of the United States and by 42 U.S.C. § 1988. 7. Venue is appropriate in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because one or more Defendants are situated within, and under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because all ...
by the Constitution and laws of the United States and by 42 U.S.C. § 1988. 7. Venue is appropriate in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because one or more Defendants are situated within, and under 28 U.S.C ...
Page 675 of 1001. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 ... 997 998 999 1000 1001 | Next »