Skip navigation

Search

238 results
Page 7 of 12. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next »

SAMs Valid, Requiring Defense Attorneys' Affirmation Invalid by A U.S. District Court held that Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) were valid as to the detention of a pretrial detainee, but defense attorneys need not give affirmation as to their acknowledgment of the SAMs. 28 C.F.R. §501.3(a) (Prevention of acts of violence …
Article • May 15, 2007
Collect Only Telephone Calls to Attorneys Denies Access to Counsel by The California First District Court of Appeal has held that pre-trial detainee's have a right to a direct line telephone to the public defender's office (PDO). The Court found that a newly installed collect-only phone system denied jail prisoners …
Alabama Jail Totality Of Conditions Suit by The US District Court Of Alabama ruled on a action brought by the prisoners at the Choctaw County jail. The prisoners complained of numerous violations of state codes for safety, and violations of their constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual …
Article • May 15, 2007
Attorney/Client Privileged Waived When Conversation Knowingly Recorded; Interstate Commerce Proven With De Minimus Effect by Attorney/Client Privileged Waived When Conversation Knowingly Recorded; Interstate Commerce Proven With De Minimus Effect The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held the government proved that robberies of a jewelry store affected interstate commerce and the …
California Attorney Richard Dangler Sanctioned for "Shameful, Frivolous" Prisoner Appeals; Resigns by John E Dannenberg California Attorney Richard Dangler Sanctioned for "Shameful, Frivolous" Prisoner Appeals; Resigns by John E. Dannenberg Sacramento, California attorney Richard Hale Dangler, Jr. was assessed $46,750 by the California Court of Appeal and forced to resign …
Article • May 15, 2007
State Appointment and Compensation of Attorneys in Federal Action Upheld by The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that legal counsel appointed in Illinois state court were legally appointed in state court and compensated by state court order in a federal civil rights action. Joan Schmude, …
Article • May 15, 2007
Free Speech Protects Right to Hire, Consult with Counsel by At 324: "The right to hire and consult an attorney is protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, association and petition. . . ." "[T]he First Amendment prohibits the state from interfering with collective action by individuals …
Article • May 15, 2007
Lawyers Must be Allowed Access to Indigent Interrogatees by The following decision was stayed, appeal was expedited, and the decision was promptly reversed on the merits in a highly instructive opinion by Judge Easterbrook. 319 F.3d 967 (7th Cir. 2003). Chicago has a legal aid agency created specifically to provide …
Article • May 15, 2007
Pro Se Prisoner Ordered to Produce Court Access Claim Discovery by The pro se plaintiff is directed to comply with various discovery requests. A party cannot refuse discovery on the ground that the adverse party already has the requested information or on the ground that the information can be gleaned …
Article • May 15, 2007
Right to Attorney Contact Visits by The court of appeals for the Ninth circuit held that Arizona prisoners and attorneys have a court access right to contact visits. Denial of contact visits inhibits effective attorney-client communication. See: Ching v. Lewis, 895 F.2d 608 (9th Cir. 1990).
Article • May 15, 2007
Legal/Media Mail and Attorney Visits Protected by The court of appeals for the Fifth circuit upheld a district court injunction prohibiting Dallas, Texas, jail officials from opening prisoners' mail from and visits with attorneys. While Texas state law did not provide for confidential media mail, it does provide for confidential …
Article • May 15, 2007
Prisoners Have Right to Confidential Meetings with Counsel by Prisoners Have Right to Confidential Meetings With Counsel The court of appeals for the Seventh circuit held that Illinois prisoners have a right to confidentially meet and confer with their attorneys. Court reversed summary judgment ruling in favor of the prisoner …
Collect Call Phone System Doesn't Violate Right to Court Access by A federal district court in Tennessee held that no constitutional violation occurred when a Tennessee prison replaced its coin operated phones with a coinless, collect call only phone system. Lawsuit was brought in context of access to counsel and …
Article • May 15, 2007
Prisoner Entitled to Be Present During Opening of Legal Mail Addressed to Him by Prisoner Entitled to Be Present During Opening of Legal Mail Addressed to Him The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a prisoner's 42 U.S.C. §1983 action that alleges prison officials opened his legal mail outside …
Article • May 15, 2007
Attorneys Not Entitled To Meet With Cooperating Witnesses by The U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a legal aid organization and its potential clients (witnesses who were cooperating with. police) had no right requiring the police to inform the client that an attorney representing them was at the …
Article • May 15, 2007
Turner Standard Not Applicable To Attorneys by The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an attorney subjected to restrictions on her speech during visits with clients at a federal prison stated claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Cheryl Sturm, a licensed Pennsylvania attorney, was …
Article • May 15, 2007
Former Prisoner Paralegal's Entry Into BOP Upheld by The Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) may prohibit a former prisoner with a record of disruptive proclivities from entering BOP prisons as a paralegal to interview prisoners. This action was brought …
Article • May 15, 2007
Attorney-Client Privilege Breached by The Supreme Court of Washington, en banc, held that a lawyer unethically revealed confidential information, thereby breaching the attorney-client privilege. William Hamilton retained attorney Douglas Schafer to aid him in forming a corporation in order to purchase a bowling alley from an estate represented by Grant …
Article • May 15, 2007
Michigan Prisoner Wearing Leg Irons During Jury Trial Harmless Error by Michigan State prisoner David Lakin appealed the denial of his Federal habeas corpus petition alleging a due process violation for being forced to wear leg irons during a jury trial. Lakin and four other prisoners attempted to escape from …
Article • May 15, 2007
Attorney-Client Privilege Doesn't Protect All Discovery by In an employment discrimination case, the defendants asserted various privileges. A document from the vice president of communications to an EEO coordinator was not protected by the attorney-client privilege. At 499: It is important to remember that, because the privilege impairs the court's …
Page 7 of 12. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next »