Skip navigation

Search

203 results
Page 7 of 11. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next »

Parole Officials Liable for False Information in Parole Violation Arrest Warrant by A federal district court in New Jersey has held that parole officials are liable for causing the arrest of a parolee based upon false information. Robert Friedland, a New Jersey state prisoner, was paroled in August, 1995. Subsequently …
Article • June 15, 1999 • from PLN June, 1999
Imminent Danger Overrides Three Strikes by The court of appeals for the Third Circuit held that conditions allegedly resulting from a vent emitting particles of dust and lint into a cell constitute a serious physical injury for purposes of circumventing the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act …
Prisoner Must Show Imminent Danger at Time of IFP Request to Avoid PLRA Three-Strikes Dismissal by The court of appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that a prisoner who is subject to the three-strikes provision in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) must show that he is under imminent …
Article • May 15, 1999 • from PLN May, 1999
District Court Can't Dismiss Appeal for Failure to Pay Filing Fee by The court of appeals for the Seventh circuit held that district courts lack the statutory authority to dismiss appeals due to a party's failure to pay the filing fee. Earl Sperow, an Illinois state prisoner, filed a lawsuit …
Eighth Circuit Upholds, Defines IFP Provisions by The court of appeals for the Eighth circuit, in two separate rulings, has upheld and defined the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the PLRA. Kenneth Murray filed a petition under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, claiming a court clerk …
Article • April 15, 1999 • from PLN April, 1999
Filed under: PLRA, Filing Fees (PLRA)
IFP Application Not Required When Suit Filed by The court of appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the PLRA does not require the filing of a trust fund account statement and an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) application at the same time the complaint is filed. Walter Garret, a Missouri …
Article • April 15, 1999 • from PLN April, 1999
No Leave to Amend Complaint for IFP Litigants by In an important procedural ruling, the court of appeals for the Ninth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) had overruled prior circuit rulings requiring that In Forma Pauperis (IFP) litigants be given an opportunity to amend their complaints …
Article • April 15, 1999 • from PLN April, 1999
PLRA Fee Provisions Apply to All Pending Cases in the Fifth Circuit by The court of appeals for the Fifth circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), which requires that prisoners ultimately pay all filing fee costs, applies retroactively to cases filed before the PLRA's enactment, if they are still …
Article • March 15, 1999 • from PLN March, 1999
PLRA "Three Strikes" Provision Upheld and Discussed by PLRA "Three Strikes" Provision Upheld and Discussed The ostensible purpose of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) was to curtail frivolous litigation by prisoners. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) was enacted which does not allow In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status for prisoners that …
Article • January 15, 1999 • from PLN January, 1999
Guard's Death Threats May Violate Eighth Amendment by The court of appeals for the District of Columbia (DC) Circuit held that a guard's death threats to a prisoner stated a claim under the Eighth amendment. The court also held that the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation …
Article • November 15, 1998 • from PLN November, 1998
No Refund of PLRA Fees by The court of appeals for the Seventh circuit held that the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) are constitutional and prisoners do not get a refund of the partial filing fees they pay if they later refuse to …
Article • October 15, 1998 • from PLN October, 1998
FRCP 12(b)(6) Standard Applied to PLRA Dismissals by The court of appeals for the Fifth circuit held that district court dismissals of prisoner lawsuits for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c) are subject to de novo review on appeal under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure …
Article • September 15, 1998 • from PLN September, 1998
Fee Payment Orders Not Immediately Appealable by Fee Payment Orders Not Immediately Appealable: The court of appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that district court orders requiring partial payment of filing fees under the PLRA cannot be appealed prior to the entry of final judgment. Kirk Thompson, a Texas state …
Article • September 15, 1998 • from PLN September, 1998
Court Refunds PLRA Deferred Fee Overpayment by A federal court in Illinois has held that neither prison officials nor the courts have the statutory authority to take more than 20% of a prisoner's monthly income to satisfy deferred filing fees under the PLRA. James Higgason, an Illinois prisoner, filed suit …
Two Year Limitations on Illinois § 1983 Suits by The court of appeals for the seventh circuit held that a district court erred in dismissing a prisoner's lawsuit because it had miscalculated the statute of limitations. The court also held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the "Three Strikes" provision of …
Article • September 15, 1998 • from PLN September, 1998
Three Strikes Doesn't Apply to Pending Cases by Three Strikes Doesn't Apply to Pending Cases: The court of appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which prohibits In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status for prisoners that have had three prior suits dismissed as frivolous, does not apply …
Article • August 15, 1998 • from PLN August, 1998
PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Mandamus by The court of appeals for the tenth circuit held "that this circuit will no longer require mandatory fees under the PLRA for filing petitions for writs of mandamus seeking to compel district courts to hear and decide actions brought solely under 28 U.S.C. …
Article • August 15, 1998 • from PLN August, 1998
PLRA Filing fees Don't Apply to Civil Commitments by PLRA Filing Fees Don't Apply to Civil Commitments: A federal district court in Wisconsin held that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA do not apply to so called "sex predators" civilly committed in detention facilities for "treatment." 28 U.S.C. § …
Article • August 15, 1998 • from PLN August, 1998
Filed under: PLRA, Filing Fees (PLRA)
Dismissal for Lying About Poverty Affirmed by Dismissal for Lying About Poverty Affirmed: The court of appeals for the seventh circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) requires courts to dismiss cases if applicants for In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status lie about their poverty. Courts have the discretion to make …
Article • August 15, 1998 • from PLN August, 1998
TDCJ PLRA Forms Okay by TDCJ PLRA Forms Okay: The court of appeals for the fifth circuit denied a prisoner's motion to proceed on appeal with IFP status because he refused to fill out a Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) form authorizing withdrawals from his prison trust account to …
Page 7 of 11. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next »