what - Search | Prison Legal News

Colonial Times, Inc. V. Gasch-509 F. 2d 517 (D.C. Cir 1975)

Case • 1975

depositions by other than stenographic means. The Rule does not state what grounds a trial judge may offer for a refusal to issue such an order. However, the Advisory Committee commentary, while far from lucid ...

Marisol A. ex rel. Forbes v. Giuliani-157 F.Supp.2d 303 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

Case • 2001

with what it had in effect at the time. Second, OCFS could make improvements to the then-existing [**16] system. Third, OCFS could replace the old CONNECTIONS system by beginning work on a new system. See id ...

Annual Report, 2007

Annual report • July 31, 2007

reports have found that these experiments are shrouded in secrecy, and the prisoners are unlikely to have given meaningful consent. They often have "volunteered" in a desperate attempt to get what ...

HRDC v. Ishee, et al., NC, Order Granting Motion to Compel, 2023

Filing • April 7, 2023

Filed under: Publications/Books, Due Process, Banned Book Lists, PLN Litigation, Censorship, HRDC Publications, HRDC Litigation

-gatherers. They must produce live witnesses who know or who can reasonably find out what happened in given circumstances.”). If an organization fails to produce a qualified individual, the court may order ...

Sh v Reed Oh Order End Stipulation Juve System Substantial Compliance 2013

Brief • January 18, 2013

them. The IDT shall identify areas of needed improvement so that the youth knows what, specifically. is required to progress to the next phase of the program. g. Each youth shall attend an IDT review ...

Morris v. Cms, Ak, Medical Neglect, Complaint

Brief

. Bardell’s request could be interpreted as an expensive MRI, returned the request to Bardell for clarification of what “obstructive series” meant. When Bardell informed him that he was only asking for a flat ...

Sorens v. Estate of Warden Gary, R&r, False Charges, 2006

Brief • 2006

defendant’s actions were unreasonable in light of clearly established law. Plaintiff’s response shall identify who did what to whom, when, where, and why -- although when “why” means the actor’s state of mind ...

In Re Prison Phone Rates Nm 2000

Brief • 2000

Filed under: Telephones

other facts and evidence that provide the Commission with information to assist it in determining what further action would be appropriate and in the public interest. ORDER CASE NO. 3113 8 10/24 ID ...

Macnamara v City of New York Ny Memo and Order Rnc Protester Arrests 2007

Brief • March 14, 2007

. (Spiegel 10/30/06 Letter at 5). According to the City, the Legal Bureau attorneys “discuss[ed] with the officer what the officer had witnessed, what the arrestee did, and/or who told that officer what ...

Gwiazdowski v County of Chester Pa Motion to Certify Class Action Strip Search 2009

Brief • October 19, 2009

‘this is what has to be followed,’” and “really [didn’t] know if it was protocol.” (Id. at 3.) Herstein followed what was told to him by his training officer. (Id. at 3.) Defendant denies that it has a blanket ...

Kies v City of Lima Oh Plf Mot in Limine Police Excessive Force 2009

Brief • 2009

it.” The court went on to state “it is fundamental to our system of justice that ‘a defendant must be tried for what he did, not for who he is.’” Id (internal citations omitted), see also U.S. v. Bell, 516 F.3d ...

Montgomery v Johnson Va Plf Memo in Reply Pld Mot for 2nd Am Compl Guard Restraint Use Excessive Force 2009

Brief • August 12, 2009

what was going to happen 2 regardless of how complacent I was or not at this time. 3 knew I 4 make an issue about the four point restraints. 5 to 6 canisters of gas on me and they're ...

Aclu v Valencia Nm Complaint 1997 Jail Conditions

Brief • 1997

going on. When asked what was causing that noise, and the jailor commented that it was one of the fire alarms. One of them had a bad battery. By the sound of the choirs that day it seemed as if the entire ...

Ny Williams v State of New York Court Order

Brief

morning. On re-direct examination he stated the reason that he did not report to the infirmary until five days later despite the pain and swelling he was experiencing, was "because of what somebody says its ...

Burton v. Waddington, R&r

Brief

state or allege what protected activity he was engaging in which triggered the defendants alleged retaliatory 24 actions. Moreover, the court cannot speculate as to what protected activity plaintiff ...

Pannone v. Stites,nj, Parole Revocation, Plt. Brief in Opposition 2004

Brief • April 19, 2004

, but does know that she did call the prison very often during this period to find out what was going on. (Pannone cert. ¶ 8). Mrs. Pannone spoke to someone in the parole office at SouthWoods, but did not ask ...

Schiller v City of New York Et Al Ny Ptlf Memo Opposing Motion to Compel 2007

Brief • January 19, 2007

arrest (i.e., what he was doing at the time of the arrest) may be credible.” II. Ms. Berrigan And The WRL Offered Uncontroverted Evidence That Their First Amendment Rights Would Be Curtailed ...

Heston v. City of Salinas, CA, Order denying Def MTD, police taser death cardiac arrest, 2006

Brief • July 11, 2006

Filed under: Cardiovascular, Stun Guns/Tasers, Police--Excessive Force

bases his claim. To the contrary, all the rules require is 'a short and plain statement of 26 the claim' that will give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon ...

Prison Health Care, Political Choice and the Accidental Death Penalty in Michigan

Article • January 15, 2010 • from PLN January, 2010

Filed under: Medical Misconduct, Commentary/Reviews, HIV/AIDS, Medication, Systemic Medical Neglect, Cardiovascular, Blood, Medical Records, Kidney, Misdiagnosis, Failure to Treat, Statistics/Trends, Eighth Amendment, Exposure to Heat, Excessive Force, Restraints, Injunctions, Class Certification, Class Notice, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness)

on to the CMS administration, but nothing ever changes. We were told by several MDOC staff that CMS administrators say they cannot tell the [providers] what to do, because they are independent contractors ...

The Prison Industries Enhancement Certification Program: Why Everyone Should be Concerned

Article • March 15, 2010 • from PLN March, 2010

Filed under: Contractor Misconduct, DOC/BOP misconduct, Government Misconduct, Prison Industries, Prison Labor, Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Federal Statutory Law, Ashurst Summers Act

, but were being retained by the prison. What Is a Prevailing Wage? Although PIECP workers are supposed to receive prevailing wages for work comparable to that of free-world employees, this is rarely ...