Skip navigation

Search

31 results
No Sexual Assault Claim Based on Abusive Metal Detector Search by The plaintiff alleged that an officer shoved a hand-held metal detector between his buttocks. He was fully clothed. He was later issued a one-day deprivation order and a misbehavior report for refusing a direct order, violating frisk procedures, and …
Article • August 15, 2008
Retaliatory Discipline Suit Dismissed by The plaintiff alleged that he was disciplined and transferred in retaliation for conduct protected by the First Amendment. The defendants are granted summary judgment based on uncontroverted affidavits that they were not personally involved. The correction officer who issued the allegedly false misbehavior report was …
Court Rejects Disciplinary Habeas on Merits, Despite Time Bar by The plaintiff's habeas challenge to a disciplinary proceeding is time-barred under AEDPA, since the proceeding was concluded in 1997 and the plaintiff missed the one-year grace period provided by the statute. The court finds no authority supporting a requirement that …
NY Prisoner’s Appeal of Prison Disciplinary Action on Grounds of Mental Illness Shot Down by On an undisclosed date, Samuel Higgins, a New York state prisoner was found guilty of fighting and causing a disturbance at a prison disciplinary hearing. His defense was that he was suffering a breakdown at …
NY Prisoner’s Disciplinary Action Reversed for Failure to Consider His Mental Health Problems by On August 15, 1989, Luis Rosado, a New York state prisoner, was referred to the psychiatric unit at the Clinton Correctional Facility. While en route, he cut a guard’s arm with a razor blade. The cut …
NY Prisoner’s Disciplinary Charges Dismissed Because of His Mental Illness by On February 25, 1985, Marco Trujillo was a New York state prisoner at the Clinton Correctional Facility. He crawled under his bunk and screamed all night and was taken to the mental health unit the next day. While on …
Article • June 15, 2008
Mental State Matters, But Not a Defense, In Prison Disciplinary Proceeding by On October 16, 1990, the Court of Appeals of New York held that, although a prison disciplinary hearing officer must consider the prisoner's mental state as a potential mitigation factor for punishment, mental state was not an affirmative …
Article • December 15, 2007
NY Prisoners Entitled to Assistant to Help Prepare Their Defenses in Tier 3 Disciplinary Hearings by Louis Avincola, a New York state prisoner, was infracted for fighting. At the ensuing Tier 3 disciplinary hearing the hearing officer produced a form with the box waiving assistance by an "employee assistant" checked. …
Article • May 15, 2007
Prisoner Entitled to Lay Advocate in Disciplinary Transfer by The Seventh Circuit court of appeals held that certain minimal due process, requirements are attached to disciplinary transfers of prisoners from the Indiana State Prison. The court held that a prisoner who was the subject of a disciplinary transfer hearing was …
Article • May 15, 2007
Prisoner Entitled to Staff Assistance at Disciplinary Hearing by The court of appeals for the Second circuit held that a New York prisoner was entitled to staff assistance in a prison disciplinary hearing. However, the court granted the defendants in this case qualified immunity from damages by noting the law …
Article • May 15, 2007
NY Prisoners Entitled to Assistant to Help Prepare Their Defenses in Tier 3 Disciplinary Hearings by NY Prisoners Entitled to Assistant to Help Prepare Their Defenses in Tier 3 Disciplinary Hearings Louis Avincola, a New York state prisoner, was infracted for fighting. At the ensuing Tier 3 disciplinary hearing the …
PRP Proper to Challenge Some WA Disciplinary Orders by The Washington state Court of Appeals held that it was proper to utilize a personal restraint petition (PRP) to challenge prison disciplinary sanction ordering disciplinary segregation and lose of good time credits. Raymond McVay, a prisoner of the Washington State Penitentiary, …
Article • April 15, 2001 • from PLN April, 2001
Second Circuit Discusses Qualified Immunity in Disciplinary Case by Second Circuit Discusses Qualified Immunity In Disciplinary Case The Second Circuit has with drawn its previous decision in Horne v. Coughlin, 155 F.3d 26 (2nd Cir. 1998), substituting an opinion that does not determine whether a mentally retarded prisoner has a …
$16 Million Agreement to Revamp NJ Prison Mental Health Care by A federal district court in New Jersey has approved a $16 million settlement in a class-action suit against state prison officials for constitutionally deficient prison mental health care. Patricia P. Pearlmutter, assistant professor of clinical law at the Center …
One-Year NY SHU Atypical and Significant Hardship by by Matthew T. Clarke A federal court in New York has held that one year in SHU is an atypical and significant hardship pursuant to Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995). The court also held that a prisoner must exhaust state …
Article • July 15, 2000 • from PLN July, 2000
Staff Representative in Medication Hearing Must Have Medical Knowledge by The court of appeals for the Fourth circuit held that federal prison officials can forcibly give a federal pretrial detainee psychotropic drugs without a court hearing. But, if the prisoner has a prison staff member acting as his representative at …
Article • July 15, 1999 • from PLN July, 1999
376 Days in New York Seg "Atypical and Significant" Hardship by 376 Days in New York Seg "Atypical and Significant" Hardship Afederal district court in New York held that a state prisoner's 376-day confinement in segregation was an atypical and significant hardship pursuant to Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 …
New York Prisoners Have Right to Staff Assistance and Witness Testimony by The court of appeals for the Second Circuit held that New York state prisoners have a right under the Due Process Clause to have disciplinary hearing officers provide staff assistance and to obtain requested documentary evidence and witness …
Prison Disciplinary Proceedings Cognizable Under § 1983 in Florida by Prison Disciplinary Proceedings Cognizable Under § 1983 In Florida AFlorida state appellate court held that a denial of staff assistance, documentary evidence, and witness testimony in a prison disciplinary hearing states a due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, …
Page 1 of 2. | 1 2 | Next »