×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Supreme Court To Define "Prevailing Party" for Purposes of Attorney Fees
Loaded on Aug. 15, 1992
published in Prison Legal News
August, 1992, page 5
Supreme Court To Define "Prevailing Party" For Purposes Of Attorney Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a "prevailing party" in a federal civil rights suit may be awarded attorneys' fees. In civil rights cases such attorneys' fees may, in some instances, be much higher than the dollar value of the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission Update, by John Perotti
- Washington Lifers Litigation Update, by John Midgley
- 1991 Prison Population Up 6.2%
- Blacks Likely to Spend More Time In Jail
- Interstate Compact Does Not Create Liberty Interest
- High AIDS Rate Behind Bars
- Study Finds Sentencing Bias in Washington State
- Prison Chief Gains Right to Counter-Sue Cons for Riot Damage
- Guards Need Not Disclose Identity Of HIV-Positive Cons
- Supreme Court Defines "Frivolous" Lawsuits
- Three Strikes, You're Out, by Ed Mead
- ABA Says Use of Prisons Not Effective Way to Fight Crime
- NCCHC Asks Congress to Improve Prison Health Care
- Infracting Cop Cannot Hear Own Infraction
- High Court to Decide if Convict Group is "Person" for IFP Status
- Supreme Court To Define "Prevailing Party" for Purposes of Attorney Fees
- Criticism of Peru Articles
- Federal Prisoner Must Exhaust BOP Remedies Before Seeking Habeas Corpus Relief
- Prison Costs More than Harvard, by Ralph Hakim Walker
- Adverse Change in Board Rules is Ex Post Facto
- Detroit's Former Chief Guilty of Embezzling
- Washington's DOC Boss Talks That Talk. Can He Walk That Walk?
- Virginia Sets Guidelines for Terminally-Ill Prisoners
- Lompoc Prison Strike
- From The Editor, by Paul Wright
- Court Bans Double Celling
- Censoring Mail From Courts Violates Due Process
- DOC Must Provide Involuntarily Committed With Treatment
- Rectal Search Upheld
- Wisconsin Lockdown, by Adrian Lomax
- Indiana Control Unit Prisoners File Suit and Strike, by Paul Wright
- Transfer Violates Access Rights
- Prisoner Entitled to Protection and Toilet Access
- Court Rules on Service and Venue
More from these topics:
- Tennessee Attorney Sues Federal Court Over Gag Order in CoreCivic Suit, Dec. 15, 2024. Corrections Corporation of America/CoreCivic, Attorneys, Gag Order.
- Bruce Johnson 1950–2024, Sept. 15, 2024. Editorials, Criminal justice system reform, Attorneys.
- $60,000 Settlement for Kansas Prisoner’s Excessive Force Claim, $578,000 for His Attorneys, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Fee Awards, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Settlements.
- Illinois Prisoner Awarded Over $822,000 For Hernia Care Denied by Wexford Health, July 1, 2024. Wexford Health Services, Failure to Treat, Attorney Fee Awards, Attorney Fees (PLRA), Damages - Punitive.
- Over $71,000 Awarded to Michigan Prisoner for Sexual Abuse by Guard, June 1, 2024. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Attorney Fee Awards, Damages.
- HRDC Awarded Over $130,000 in Legal Costs and Fees for Defendant’s “Bad Faith” in Maine Records Lawsuit, April 1, 2024. Attorney Fee Awards, Public Records Act, HRDC Litigation.
- South Carolina Sheriff Ordered to Pay $37,500 in Fees and Costs in Jail FOIA Case, March 1, 2024. Attorney Fee Awards, Public Records Act, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
- Michigan Supreme Court: DOC Owes Attorney Fees in Public Records Case Even if Plaintiff Is Represented Pro Bono, Feb. 1, 2024. Attorney Fee Awards, Public Records, Public Records Act.
- $10,000 Verdict for Fired Guard’s Failure to Protect Louisiana Prisoner From Stabbing, Jan. 1, 2024. Prisoner-Prisoner Assault, Snitch Jacketing, Failure to Protect (General), Attorney Fee Awards, Attorney Fees (PLRA).
- Convicted Sex Offender Now a Licensed Attorney in Washington State, Oct. 15, 2023. Sex Offenders (Discrimination), Attorneys.