×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Cause of Action Accrues on Disciplinary Reversal
Loaded on Oct. 15, 1996
published in Prison Legal News
October, 1996, page 9
The court of appeals for the second circuit held that the statute of limitations for a § 1983 action does not begin to run until a prisoner has successfully challenged the disciplinary hearing in state court. Theodore Black is a New York state prisoner. In 1990 he was infracted and …
Filed under:
Disciplinary Litigation,
Disciplinary Appeals,
Civil Procedure,
Defenses,
Complaints,
Limitations,
Habeas Corpus,
Qualified Immunity.
Location:
New York.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- UNICOR Hogs Body Armor Market, by Dan Pens
- Prisoners May Be Allowed to Lead Religious Services
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- The "Honorable Men" Defense, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Plaintiff Entitled to Respond to Qualified Immunity Defense
- Alleged Work Refusal Requires Trial
- Unrest in South American Prisons
- Less than Lethal Force Liability
- Smoke and Mirrors
- A Matter of Fact
- Correction
- Cause of Action Accrues on Disciplinary Reversal
- Prisoner Testimony Must Be Considered in Spears Hearing
- Texas Parole Rules on Litigants and Victim Statements Enjoined
- Extending Release Date Violates Eighth Amendment
- Attorney Fees Awarded for Opposing Motion to Vacate
- Attica: Looking Back 25 Years, by Jaan Laaman
- Jail Guards File Suit
- Fifth Circuit Applies New Standard to Detainee Claims
- MCC Settlement Upheld
- Evidence Required for Disciplinary Sanction, Sandin Questioned
- Pepper Spray Madness, by Lynn Wilson
- Pepper Spray Unsafe?
- Indigents Entitled to Full Credit for Pretrial Detention
- De Novo Review Required of Magistrate's Report
- Texas Shaving Rule Declared Illegal
- Parolee's Jail Rights Discussed
- Missouri Haircut Rule Upheld under RFRA
- No Right to Assistance in Family Law
- Retaliation for Grievance Committee Participation Requires Trial
- PI Granted in Haircut Claim
- Court Responsible for Jury Demand
- Complaint Can't Be Dismissed if Partial Filing Fee Paid
- No FLSA Protection for Work Release Prisoners
- Right to Witnesses and Court Access Well Established
- News in Brief
- Court Okays Disclosure of AIDS Status
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Revives HRDC Challenge to Washington DOC Mail Restrictions, Aug. 1, 2026. Qualified Immunity, Publications/Books, Due Process, Censorship, First Amendment, rights.
- Detroit Pays $5.8 Million to Former State Prisoner Exonerated of Murder After 15 Years, Aug. 1, 2026. Wrongful Conviction, Qualified Immunity, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Eyewitness Identification, Evidence - Failure to Disclose.
- New York Ordered to Pay Prisoner $25,000 for Failing to Protect Him from Attack, Aug. 1, 2026. Failure to Protect (General), Defenses, Damages - Compensatory, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment, Deliberate Indifference.
- Seventh Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity to Detectives Who Revealed Prisoner Was Informant, Denies Him Anonymity, Aug. 1, 2026. Failure to Protect (General), Physical Injury Rule, Qualified Immunity, Informants (Failure to Protect), 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights.
- Sixth Circuit Affirms Denial of State-Law Qualified Immunity in Scabies Case, Aug. 1, 2026. Corizon, Systemic Medical Neglect, Contagious Disease -- Misc., Qualified Immunity, Deliberate Indifference.
- Fourth Circuit Revives Disabled Prisoner’s Claim for Denial of Out-of-Cell Exercise Time, Aug. 1, 2026. Totality of Conditions, Eighth Amendment, Exercise, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity.
- Oregon Reaches $49 Million Settlement with State Prisoners in COVID-19 Class-Action, Aug. 1, 2026. COVID-19, Eighth Amendment, Settlements, Class Certification, Qualified Immunity.
- Eleventh Circuit Holds § 2255 Motion Not “Second or Successive” After Intervening Amended Judgment Corrected Unlawful Sentences, Even as to Claims Concerning an Undisturbed Count, Aug. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Effect of Vacatur.
- Oregon Supreme Court: Jail Credit Statute Focuses Upon Legal Custody Not Physical Custody Location, July 1, 2026. Civil Procedure, Sentencing, Appeals/Appellate Jurisdiction, Criminal Justice, Statutory Construction/Interpretation.
- Eighth Circuit Dismisses Federal Prisoner’s Challenge to BOP Denying His Request for Expedited Transfer to Prerelease Custody, June 1, 2026. Release and Reentry, Habeas Corpus, First Step Act, Community Confinement/Home Detention, Credits.