×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Filing Fees Required in Civil Mandamus
Loaded on July 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
July, 1997, page 10
The court of appeals for the tenth circuit held that the PLRA's filing fee requirements apply when a prisoner litigant seeks a writ of mandamus in an ongoing civil suit. The court did not discuss whether this applied to writs of mandamus in criminal or habeas proceedings. The court also …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Edwards v. Balisok: A Partial Victory for Prisoners, by David C Fathi
- Not All Things Considered
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Ruchell Cinque Magee: Sole Survivor Still, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Trouble Coming Every Day; ADX-The First Year, by Ray Luc Levasseur
- Prisoners Roasted Alive
- Prison Pay Policy May Violate Court Access
- Administrative Exhaustion Requirements Not Retroactive
- Automatic Stay Provisions
- PLRA Filing Fees Not Applicable to Habeas
- Filing Fees Required in Civil Mandamus
- Consent Decree Termination
- Special Masters
- 6th Circuit Upholds PLRA IFP Provisions
- PLRA Doesn't Apply to Immigration Detainees
- Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive
- A Matter of Fact
- New York Smoking Suit Set for Trial
- Puerto Rican POW 'Graduated' from ADX Florence to USP Marion, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Washington Prisoner Escapes from State's Most Secure Lockup
- Private Prison Disciplinary Action Subject to Colorado Court Review
- Judge Rules Texas Prisoner's Death a Result of Excessive Force
- Prisoners of Colonialism: The Struggle for Justice in Puerto Rico, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- In Defense of Mumia, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Death Blossoms, by Mark Cook
- Suit Seeks to Expose BOP 'Suicide' Cover-up
- Jury Trial May Require Plaintiffs' Presence
- Hygiene and Retaliation Claims Require Trial
- Lucasville Uprising: $4.1 Million Settlement
- Plight of Undertrial Prisoners in India, by Sankar Sen
- News in Brief
- State Must Pay for Prisoner Witnesses
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Refunds Filing Fee to “Struck-Out” California Prisoner Denied Indigent Status Under PLRA, May 1, 2024. Filing Fees (PLRA), Recalling Mandate, Three Strike Litigants.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Ohio Supreme Court Orders Records Produced for State Prisoner, May 1, 2024. Mandamus, Public Records Act, Mandamus, Writ of, Mandamus and Prohibition.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Ohio Prisoner Wins $2,000 Settlement for Guard Abuse Claims, Loses Appeal to Uncover Identity of Prison Officials Who Negotiated It, Feb. 1, 2024. Settlements, Mandamus, Public Records, Public Records Act.
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Only Statute, Not Agency Policy, Creates Legal Duty Enforceable in Mandamus, July 19, 2022. Sex Offenders (Discrimination), Mandamus.