×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
PLRA Doesn't Apply to Immigration Detainees
Loaded on July 15, 1997
published in Prison Legal News
July, 1997, page 11
The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) does not apply to immigration detainees. Anthony Ojo was convicted of a drug offense, sentenced to five years in prison and after completing that sentence the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) began deportation proceedings …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Edwards v. Balisok: A Partial Victory for Prisoners, by David C Fathi
- Not All Things Considered
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Ruchell Cinque Magee: Sole Survivor Still, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Trouble Coming Every Day; ADX-The First Year, by Ray Luc Levasseur
- Prisoners Roasted Alive
- Prison Pay Policy May Violate Court Access
- Administrative Exhaustion Requirements Not Retroactive
- Automatic Stay Provisions
- PLRA Filing Fees Not Applicable to Habeas
- Filing Fees Required in Civil Mandamus
- Consent Decree Termination
- Special Masters
- 6th Circuit Upholds PLRA IFP Provisions
- PLRA Doesn't Apply to Immigration Detainees
- Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive
- A Matter of Fact
- New York Smoking Suit Set for Trial
- Puerto Rican POW 'Graduated' from ADX Florence to USP Marion, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Washington Prisoner Escapes from State's Most Secure Lockup
- Private Prison Disciplinary Action Subject to Colorado Court Review
- Judge Rules Texas Prisoner's Death a Result of Excessive Force
- Prisoners of Colonialism: The Struggle for Justice in Puerto Rico, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- In Defense of Mumia, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Death Blossoms, by Mark Cook
- Suit Seeks to Expose BOP 'Suicide' Cover-up
- Jury Trial May Require Plaintiffs' Presence
- Hygiene and Retaliation Claims Require Trial
- Lucasville Uprising: $4.1 Million Settlement
- Plight of Undertrial Prisoners in India, by Sankar Sen
- News in Brief
- State Must Pay for Prisoner Witnesses
More from these topics:
- Eleventh Circuit Holds § 2255 Motion Not “Second or Successive” After Intervening Amended Judgment Corrected Unlawful Sentences, Even as to Claims Concerning an Undisturbed Count, Aug. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Effect of Vacatur.
- SCOTUS Continues to Hack Away At First Step Act, July 1, 2026. Conditions of Confinement, PLRA, Post-release, ex-offender, re-entry, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Compassionate Release.
- Free Phone Calls Saved Prisoners and Their Families More than $600 Million, Report Finds, July 1, 2026. Conditions of Confinement, PLRA, Prisoner Privileges, Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Telephones.
- Fifth Circuit Kills Louisiana Prison Medical and Mental Health Care Reform, July 1, 2026. Medical, Conditions of Confinement, PLRA, Immunity/Liability, Mental Health.
- Eighth Circuit Dismisses Federal Prisoner’s Challenge to BOP Denying His Request for Expedited Transfer to Prerelease Custody, June 1, 2026. Release and Reentry, Habeas Corpus, First Step Act, Community Confinement/Home Detention, Credits.
- Sixth Circuit Announces State-Law Exceptions to Appeal Deadlines Preserve “Pending” Status Under AEDPA, Holding Belated-Appeal Procedures Toll Federal Habeas Limitations Period, April 1, 2026. Limitations, Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
- Eighth Circuit Rules Iowa Prisoner’s Adverse Summary Judgment Is Not a “Strike”, March 1, 2026. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Access To Courts.
- SCOTUS Sides with Federal Prisoner in Habeas Review Case, March 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Mandatory Minimum Sentence, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Predicate Acts/Offenses.
- SCOTUS Announces Federal Prisoners May Seek Certiorari Review of Authorization Denials Under § 2255(h) and Are Not Subject to § 2244(b)(1)’s Bar on Previously Presented Claims, Feb. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Courts Have Inherent Authority to Correct Unauthorized Sentences at Any Time Without Habeas Petition, Jan. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, Possession or Use of Firearms, Sentences - Authorized, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Effect of Vacatur.