×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies § 1983 Claims
John Midgley and David C. Fathi
Recently, the United States Supreme Court has made it difficult for prisoners to successfully file claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that "necessarily imply" the invalidity of a conviction or a decision that lengthens a prison term, such as a prison disciplinary hearing that ...
Recently, the United States Supreme Court has made it difficult for prisoners to successfully file claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that "necessarily imply" the invalidity of a conviction or a decision that lengthens a prison term, such as a prison disciplinary hearing that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Through the Civil Commitment Looking Glass, by Tamara Menteer
- A Zoo Within a Prison
- CCA Sells Self; Wackenhut Creates REIT
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- NJ Prisoners Refuse to Swallow PINs
- Idaho Law Libraries Closed, Pillaged, by M.M.
- STGMU-tized in New Jersey, by T.R.
- Notes from the Unrepenitentiary, by Laura Whitehorn
- MCI Refund to Florida Prisoner Families
- Los Angeles Jail Death Ruled Homicide
- The Tough-On-Crime Myth: Real Solutions to Cut Crime, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- The Real War on Crime: The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission (Book Review), by Daniel Burton-Rose
- The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class and Criminal Justice, by Daniel Burton-Rose
- Union County, NJ, Jail Guards Convicted
- PLRA Finding Required for Injunctive Relief
- Plaintiffs Must Be Allowed to Present Evidence in PLRA Motions to Terminate Prospective Relief
- TDCJ PLRA Forms Okay
- CA Tort Claim Not Required for Administrative Exhaustion
- Consent Decree Termination Upheld
- Dismissal for Lying About Poverty Affirmed
- PLRA Filing fees Don't Apply to Civil Commitments
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Mandamus
- $22,500 to Seattle WA Jail Brutality Suit
- Proof of Administrative Exhaustion Required
- Mock Prison Riot Staged
- Racism in the Ranks, by Willie Wisely
- WA Prison Telemarketing Elicits Controversy - Again, by Paul Wright
- CBCC Warden Fired in Telemarketing Hoopla
- Bureau of Prisons Estopped from Denying Sentence Reduction
- Sentence Runs During Wrongful Release
- U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies § 1983 Claims, by David C Fathi
- Jericho: Thoughts From Political Prisoners in Leavenworth, by Jaan Laaman
- Jericho '98 March and Rally
- Convict Mine Labor in the Information Age, by Dan Pens
- Cheaper to Exile Prisoners?, by Dan Pens
- Prisons Promoting Tourism, by Alex Friedmann
- Jailers Charged in Bribery, Kickback Schemes
- WI Predator-Law Poster Boy Gets Released
- WI Guard Settles Discrimination Suit for $105,000
- News in Brief
- Mailbox Rule Applied to Habeas Petitions
- WA DOC Investigators Can't Detain Visitors: Drugs Suppressed
- Oregon Guard Pleads Guilty to Perjury
- Risk of Serious Harm States Claim
- Disciplinary Hearing Violations Enjoined
- Probable Cause Required for Visitor Body Cavity Search
More from David C Fathi:
- Shouldn’t Innocence Matter?, Sept. 15, 2009
- Custody Vs. Treatment Debate: Addicted to Punishment, July 15, 2009
- Prison’s Littlest Victims, July 15, 2009
- An unfair prison litigation system, July 15, 2009
- Texas Increasingly out of Step on Death Penalty, May 15, 2009
- 32 Years on Death Row, March 15, 2009
- Prison Nation, March 15, 2009
- Executing the Innocent?, March 15, 2009
- Obama Administration Contends Prisoner Has No Right to DNA Testing, March 15, 2009
- Separate and Unequal Justice for Prisoners, March 15, 2009
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Grants Stay and Abeyance of Federal Habeas Petition to Allow Petitioner to Exhaust State Remedies, April 15, 2025. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Amendments to Petition.
- New York Prison Officials Found Routinely Violating HALT Act With Overuse of Solitary Confinement, Feb. 15, 2025. Disciplinary Hearings, Control Units/SHU/Solitary Confinement, Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.
- Ninth Circuit Holds District Courts Have No Authority Under Rule 4 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases to Dismiss Habeas Petition on the Merits, Dec. 15, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Dismissal, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to California Prisoner on Napue Claim Because Prosecution Failed to Correct Informant’s False Testimony That He Did Not Receive Any Benefit In Exchange for His Testimony, Dec. 1, 2024. Informants, Habeas Corpus, Informants and Paid Witnesses, False Testimony.
- Public Defender Files Habeas Petitions for Detainees at “Horrific” Baltimore Lockup, Nov. 15, 2024. Failure to Treat, Conditions of Confinement, Hygiene Supplies, Disclosure of Records, Habeas Corpus.
- Ninth Circuit Denies Habeas Relief to Prisoner Who Invoked Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel During Custodial Interrogation but Made Incriminating Statements to Undercover Informant Posing as Fellow Prisoner Because Right to Counsel Not Violated, Nov. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Counsel - Right to.