×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Court Questions PLRA IFP Provisions
Loaded on March 15, 1998
published in Prison Legal News
March, 1998, page 14
In a rare voice of dissent to the PLRA's filing fee provisions, Judge Reynolds of the U.S. district court in Wisconsin, described the filing fee requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, then summed it up. "This provision is mean spirited and unnecessary. In forma pauperis is fundamental to our ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Kafka in the Desert: Palestinian Detainees Struggle
- Israeli Soldier Jailed for Refusing to Guard Palestinian Detainees
- Tales from the Washington IMU Crypt, by M L
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Reaching the Breaking Point, by M L
- Fingers in the PIE, by D.H.
- BJS Reports on Sentencing and Imprisonment
- Doing Life: Reflections of Men and Women Serving Life Sentences. Portraits and Interviews, by Dan Pens
- Peruvian Lawyers Arrested
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics, by John Midgley
- California Irradiates Prison Visitors
- WSP Mail Rules Upheld
- Washington Porn Ban Challenged
- BOP Porn Ban Held Unconstitutional
- Struggle at Folsom, by Willie Wisely
- Spanish Speaking Prisoners Entitled to Interpreters
- Court Questions PLRA IFP Provisions
- Attorney Fee Award in Smoking Suit Affirmed
- Arizona Court Fee Law Upheld
- AZ Jail's Discriminatory Treatment of Muslims Requires Trial
- Slavery in South Carolina, by Dan Pens
- Ohio Death Row Uprising
- West Virginia Jailers Sentenced to Prison
- Turning the Screws in California, by Willie Wisely
- Sixth Circuit Discusses Habeas IFP
- Tax Court Required to Assist in Witness Subpoena
- News in Brief
- Ad Seg May Require Due Process
- Snitch Jacketing States 8th Amendment Claim
- Supervisors Liable for Excessive Force
- Ohio Students Rally in DC
- Health Care Contractor Subject to Monell Liability
- Evidence Must Support Disciplinary Ruling
- Survivors Manual
- Zain Fallout Continues
- Failure to Protect Informant Violates 8th Amendment
- Class Action Certification Clarified
- New Jersey DOC Required to Follow Own Rules
- Pelican Bay $600,000 Wrongful Death Settlement
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Refunds Filing Fee to “Struck-Out” California Prisoner Denied Indigent Status Under PLRA, May 1, 2024. Filing Fees (PLRA), Recalling Mandate, Three Strike Litigants.
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Tenth Circuit: Colorado Prisoner’s Injury Requiring Medical Treatment Not De Minimus, July 15, 2023. Failure to Treat, PLRA.
- After Eleventh Circuit Says ICE Detainee Is Not “Prisoner” Subject to PLRA, He Goes Missing from Georgia, March 1, 2023. PLRA, Detainers.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Third Circuit Says Mixed Dismissal of Civil Rights Action Not a Strike Under PLRA, April 1, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Civilly Detained Sex Offender Plaintiff Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Not a Prisoner Under PLRA, Dec. 1, 2021. PLRA, Sex Offender Classification.
- Seventh Circuit: PLRA Mandates Dismissal for Deceit on IFP Application, Sept. 1, 2021. PLRA, Indigent Defense, False Statements/Perjury.