×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
$28,719 Assessed Against Pro Se Litigant
Loaded on Nov. 15, 1998
published in Prison Legal News
November, 1998, page 25
Afederal district court in Virginia assessed $28,719.25 in defendants' attorney fees against an unsuccessful pro se prisoner litigant but declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions. John McGlothlin, a Virginia state prisoner, filed suit claiming violation of his right to the free exercise of his religion by prison officials. The lawsuit …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Virginia Prisons 'Wide Open to Business', by Dan Pens
- State Audit Exposes VCE Mismanagement
- Texas May Not Retroactively Stop Mandatory Release
- Notes from the Unrepenitentiary, by Laura Whitehorn
- Restorative Justice Booklet Available, by Dan Pens
- Youngstown Break-Out Leads to Political, Financial Fall-Out, by Alex Friedmann
- Fired SCI Greene Guards Regain Jobs
- News in Brief
- No Refund of PLRA Fees
- PLRA Termination Provision Constitutional in Eleventh Circuit
- MT Prisoners Win Damages and Fees in Riot Suit
- No Exhaustion Required in Guard Attack
- Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Not Jurisdictional
- State Auditor Blasts Texas Correctional Industries
- DC Circuit Resurrects Hewitt v. Helms
- Abuses Continue at Private INS Facility, by Alex Friedmann
- NY Seg Case Dismissed on Remand
- With Advocates Lke These: Capitulation, Collaboration and CURE-Ohio, by Paul Wright
- Texas Prisoners Bake to Death, by Alex Friedmann
- No Immunity in Failure to Protect Informant Suit
- Hawaii Prisoners Challenge 'Sex Offender' Label
- NC AG Opinions Reversed in Consecutive Sentence Servitude, by Roger Grubb
- Washington Good Time Loss Implicates Due Process
- Medical Restraint Requires Doctor's Supervision
- Successive Texas Habeas Corpus Defined
- ADA/RA Apply to Jails and Give Deaf Right to TDD
- No Qualified Immunity for Private Health Care Provider
- Liberty Interest Created By Fine
- Holding Pretrial Detainee in Prison May Violate Due Process
- Colorado Supreme Court Holds Utility Commission Lacks Jurisdiction Over Prison Phone Gouging
- BOP Sentence Reduction Granted to Non-Violent Offender
- Trial Required in Kosher Diet Claim
- D.C. Smoking Injunction Reversed
- Segregation Requires Less Due Process
- $28,719 Assessed Against Pro Se Litigant
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit Vacates Award of Costs to Prison Officials, Revives Prisoner’s Claim Alleging Denial of Access to Functioning Toilets and Exposure to Other Prisoners’ Feces, Oct. 1, 2026. Plumbing, Sanitation, Summary Judgment, Costs, Deliberate Indifference.
- Oregon Supreme Court: Jail Credit Statute Focuses Upon Legal Custody Not Physical Custody Location, July 1, 2026. Civil Procedure, Sentencing, Appeals/Appellate Jurisdiction, Criminal Justice, Statutory Construction/Interpretation.
- Eighth Circuit Rules Plaintiff Must Cover Expert Costs, July 1, 2026. Costs, Expert Witnesses, Bill of Costs.
- Over $222,000 in Legal Costs and Fees Awarded to HRDC in Florida Records Suit Against Centurion, Dec. 1, 2025. Attorney Fee Awards, Costs, Disclosure of Records, Public Records, Public Records Act.
- Sixth Circuit Clarifies What Constitutes PLRA “Strike” and Reinstates Michigan Prisoner’s Lawsuit, Nov. 1, 2025. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation, Sovereign Immunity, Access To Courts.
- The Crushing Toll of Ohio’s Death Penalty: A Billion-Dollar Failure, May 15, 2025. Costs, Death Penalty.
- Missouri Repeals “Pay-to-Stay” Law, May 1, 2025. Cost of Prison Systems, Costs, Ability to Pay.
- Bodycam Footage for Sale: Ohio Joins the List of States Charging Money for Bodycam Footage, While Others Restrict It Entirely, April 15, 2025. Videotaping, Costs, Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Funds for Investigative Services.
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Alabama Jail Accused of Granting Detainee’s Medical Bond Just Before Death to Avoid Costly Medical Care, Nov. 15, 2024. Failure to Treat, Costs, Bail Bonds.

